Chemistry Homework #8
Classical Bonding and Intermolecular Forces
Oxtoby, Nachtrieb & Gillis -
Chapter 3
42.
|
on central atom |
number |
geometry |
geometry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.
|
on central atom |
number |
geometry |
geometry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The bond angle of TeH2 is expected to be less than the ideal 109.5º due to repulsion from the non-bonding pairs.
** The bond angles of AsF3 are expected to be less than the ideal 109.5º.
† The four fluorine atoms that form the
"base" of the pyramid are expected to be pushed toward the apex fluorine
due to repulsion from the lone pair.
Oxtoby, Nachtrieb & Gillis -
Chapter 5
16: The most important attractive forces acting between the following species are:
a) Ne: London dispersion forces (induced dipole/ induced dipole attractions)18. An atom of argon will be more attracted to an atom of krypton since krypton's electron cloud is more polarizable, and therefore susceptible to an induced dipole, than either argon or neon.
b) ClF: dipole-dipole attractions
c) F2: London dispersion forces
d) BaCl2: ionic attractions
22. In this series, IF5 is expected to be the solid, BrF5 is expected to be the liquid and ClF5 is expected to be the gas. Not only would the polarizability be greater for IF5 (resulting in larger London dispersion forces), but the dipole moment will be the largest for this molecule since the difference in electronegativity is greatest for the I-F bond. This will result in stronger dipole-dipole attractions.
24. Order of boiling points:
order of boiling point | compound | dominant intermolecular force |
(1) lowest | He | London dispersion |
(2) | Ar | London dispersion (Ar is more polarizable than He) |
(3) | SO2 | dipole-dipole attractions |
(4) | HF | hydrogen bonding |
(5) highest | CaF2 | ionic attractions |
28. H2O2 is capable of hydrogen
bonding since there is hydrogen bonded to oxygen, and the oxygen has lone
pairs available to "bond" to hydrogen atoms on other molecules. It should
therefore have a higher boiling point than either F2, which
has only London dispersion forces, or H2S, which will have relatively weak
dipole-dipole attractions.
DeKock and Gray - Chapter 2
38.
desired geometry |
required |
|
|
a) angular |
|
|
|
b) T-shaped |
|
|
|
c) pyramidal |
|
|
|
d) seesaw |
|
|
|
e) square planar |
|
|
|
f) square pyramidal |
|
|
|
g) trigonal bipyramidal |
|
|
|
h) octahedral |
|
|
|
40. XeF5+ is a perfectly reasonable
species. The central xenon would have an oxidation state of +6, meaning
it would have one lone pair. As such it would have steric number of six
and would have perfect square pyramidal geometry.
43. The difference in electronegativity between oxygen
and hydrogen (Dc = 1.24) is greater than that
for oxygen and fluorine (Dc = 0.54), resulting
in greater dipole moments for the individual bonds. Moreover, the electron
pairs on the oxygen atom in OF2 will partially offset the dipole
in the direction of the fluorine atoms. In the case of water, the lone
pairs on oxygen are directed in the same direction as the bond dipoles,
enhancing the overall dipole moment of the molecule.