EVERGREEN SUPREME COURT
APPELLATE ADVOCACY PROJECT
 

WRITING THE APPELLATE BRIEF:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This section of the brief summarizes the facts of the case and its procedural history. Some appellate courts require that these be provided in two separate sections. In U.S. Supreme Court briefs, they are usually combined under the same section of the brief, but some attorneys nonetheless prefer to create subsections labeled "Procedural History" and "Statement of the Facts". Probably it is best to consider the procedural history as an integral part of the facts that the appellate court needs to know and allow your narration of that history to flow naturally from your account of the substantive facts.

The statement of the procedural history describes the nature of the case and briefly summarizes how the lower courts disposed of the case. It includes the dates of the lower court judgments as well as the date of the filing of the request that the Supreme Court review the case (petition for a writ of certiorari) and the date that the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

The statement of the facts is extremely important. It should be succinct, clear, accurate, complete and easy to understand. Assume that your statement is the court’s first exposure to the facts of the case you are arguing. Because that is often the situation, you have the opportunity to "set the stage" and to help the court to understand what your case is all about.

The first step in writing the statement of the case is to study the record carefully. In a real case, this means studying the lower court transcripts, including the trial proceedings. Since we do not have such a record available for this class, the "record" for our purposes will consist primarily of the opinions of both the Federal District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals. Of course, you will want to consult other cases. As you read these opinions, look for every fact which will support your, as well as your opponent’s, side of the case.

Things to remember when you draft the statement of facts:

1. You should present only the information which is relevant to understanding those points which are in dispute and the arguments which you will present on those points.

2. Remember at all times that you are not neutral; you are advocating your client’s position. This means that you should emphasize the facts that are favorable to your client, that you should present them forcefully, and that you should use affirmative language to describe them. This does not mean that you may misstate facts, be untruthful or disregard critical facts that are adverse to your client.

3. You must point out critical adverse facts. The surest way to undermine your brief is to omit facts that are important to the case. If you ignore critical adverse facts, the opposing counsel will discredit your brief by pointing them out. This does not mean, however, that you must make the opposing counsel’s case. While you must be truthful and candid in relating adverse facts, you should not present them forcefully or affirmatively, as the opposing counsel surely will. It is possible to minimize the impact of adverse facts while being truthful and accurate. Two techniques are to use the passive voice and weak descriptive terms, especially verbs.

4. Use detailed facts to paint the picture you want to court to see. However, use only those details that are essential to that picture. If dates, names and numbers are not important, do not include them.

5. Do not use conclusory facts that only hint at what happened. Be specific in explaining what happened.

6. Organize your presentation of the facts in some logical order. Most of the time, the best method is to present the facts chronologically. Some attorneys, however, prefer to organize the facts around the issues as they will appear in the arguments section of the brief. This can be tricky, so I recommend that you use the chronological approach.  Note that this does not mean that you may provide a seriatim choronology of events and dates.  You must relate the facts in a narrative fashion.

7. Check your grammar and spelling carefully. While you certainly should use your word processor’s spelling and grammar checks, remember that these are merely tools to point out possible problems. A spell checker will often suggest a wrong word and certainly is not capable of identifying correct homonyms (e.g., "suite" versus "sweet") or pointing out all typos (e.g., if you typed "then" when you meant to type "the").

8. Consider the statement of the case that you have written as a draft that you will consult often as you write the argument section of the brief. After you have finished the argument section later in the brief-writing process, you will want to re-write or make adjustments to the statement of the case. At that time, you may need to add facts not in the statement but which you refer to in your argument. Similarly, consider deleting facts that you included in the statement but which you did not refer to in your argument--but only if those facts will not help the appellate court to understand your case.
 
 
 
 

© 2003 by José Gómez