ARCHIVE - D's blog http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/blog/61 en ARCHIVE - Response to Metropolis http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/response-to-metropolis <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">Why is the Rotwang’s Robot gendered feminine? </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">This may be tricky question. First, there is the possibility that originally the Robot is not gendered at all, that is, how it is seen in its unskinned form. And then it is later gendered feminine simply because it takes the form of Maria, who is a woman. Better to forget the ‘male gaze’ and all that nonsense. I do actually think the Robot was originally intended to be feminine, even though besides having either large pecs or small breasts, the rest of the form is gender indeterminate. Rotwang it seems had an affair with Freder’s mother, and after her death he was lugubrious and lonely. So the Robot took a vague feminine form as determined by the absence of a woman he once cared for. Damn, someone should tell Huyssen that men cry too. </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;"> </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">The android Hadaly of <em>Tomorrow’s Eve</em> and the android Maria of <em>Metropolis</em>, well kids, let’s just say it’s like the Good Witch of the East and the Wicked Witch of the West. Except with more irony. <em>The Wizard of Oz</em> was a bit short on that, though maybe because it was primarily a children&#39;s movie and if there’s anything parents are more reluctant to expose their children to than any kind of sexual behavior it’s irony. Irony is disruptive; it leads to sarcasm and also some of the more sophistacated kinds of teenage rebellion. Anyhow, Villiers put mouthfulls of irony in </span><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">Edison</span><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">; his diatribes on Hadaly’s advantages were gems (in paragraph form) of trenchant blindness. Lang’s approach to the android Maria was a bit more direct, a bit more openly suspicious of the technology that can mimic and improve upon human existence. With Villiers, I don’t know, I get the sense that as he wrote </span><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">Edison</span><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">’s ironic dialog there was no insignificant part of him that really felt that the inventor was both sincere <em>and</em> wise. I mean that Villiers’ </span><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;">Edison</span><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Courier New&quot;"> was simultaneously sordidly, obliviously ironic and also a genuine humanist and visionary; and that Hadaly is both a ominous and subtle literary mirror and also an inspiring apparition of human Progess. In the end, I feel Lang’s android Maria was an unambiguous tool for plot development and cultural critique, while Hadaly was a mysterious form that evokes in me commensurately mysterious reactions.</span></p><p><a href="http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/response-to-metropolis">read more</a></p> http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/response-to-metropolis#comment Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:31:42 -0800 D 687 at http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody ARCHIVE - Feminist Film Art of the 70's http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/feminist-film-art-of-the-70s <p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Garamond">Feminist Film Art of the 70’s :</span></strong></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Maiandra GD&quot;"> </span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Maiandra GD&quot;">Is feminism a political movement – Is it a movement – Does it move – What does it move – Who does feminism move – Am I to be moved – Moved from what to what – Who is moved by anything political anyway – (You should ask yourself how you contribute to patriarchy) – Well then am I moved by art – {art?} – Feminist <em>art</em> might then move me – &lt;I’m ripping out my patriarchy in pieces&gt; –Yet how am I not moved by any of these five feminist films – {move?} – As follows :</span></p> <p style="margin-left: 0.25in" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Maiandra GD&quot;"> </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in" class="MsoNormal">&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Symbol"><span>·<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"> </span></span></span>&lt;!--[endif]--><em><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Maiandra GD&quot;">Vertical Roll. </span></em><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Maiandra GD&quot;">Jonas’ film is what? Twenty minutes of noise and flicker? Avant-garde experimentation? A joke at the viewers expens(e)&lt;ive&gt;? Deliciously audacious and disturbingly hypnotic? </span></p> <p style="margin-left: 0.25in" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: &quot;Maiandra GD&quot;">Here’s the square : her film is not in the least feminist (and I don’t even have the slightest idea what “feminist” determines). It is feminine only in that a female body is the single object throughout. It is experimental film art, untainted by some message or agenda. Who deemed this film “feminist”? I doubt Jonas did, unless she was greatly confused.</span></p><p><a href="http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/feminist-film-art-of-the-70s">read more</a></p> http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/feminist-film-art-of-the-70s#comment Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:29:06 -0800 D 647 at http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody ARCHIVE - Beauty Parlor Presentation http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/beauty-parlor-presentation See attached<br /> http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/beauty-parlor-presentation#comment Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:17:00 -0700 D 450 at http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody ARCHIVE - History of Sexuality Essay http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/history-of-sexuality-essay Concept Rhyming Essay # 1 Attached<br /> http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/history-of-sexuality-essay#comment Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:02:08 -0700 D 211 at http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody ARCHIVE - Tuesday October 9; In Class Writing; Census Taker http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/tuesday-october-9-in-class-writing-census-taker <p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">It was nearly empty, being another drizzling Monday night. I liked his looks, the shape of his face, the tiredness in his eyes, his quietness. I found, inevitably, an opportunity to speak to him. I mentioned that I hadn&#39;t seen him before and that on a drizzling Monday night mostly just regulars come by.</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">&quot;I&#39;m from out of town.&quot; he said, slightly defensive, or maybe his voice only sounded that way. He looked quite tired, that&#39;s for sure.</font> </p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3"> &quot;What on earth could you be doing here in Fairborn? There&#39;s hardly anything here.&quot; I said.</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">&quot;Oh? I haven&#39;t looked really. I got here today and I&#39;m leaving early tomorrow.&quot;</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3"> &quot;On some kind of business?&quot; I asked, very interested now, because there is no business in Fairborn.</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">Perhaps he saw my question as suspicion. He shifted his body back towards the bar, starring at the bottles lining the wall. </font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3"> He must&#39;ve worked hard to look so tired, but I couldn&#39;t imagine what work he could find for one day around here. </font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">After a few minutes he turned abruptly back towards me. &quot;I&#39;ll tell you, because I&#39;m about to leave and I know you&#39;re curious. Although it&#39;s all very boring to me. Except on rare occasions.&quot;</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">I didn&#39;t say anything.</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">&quot;I&#39;m a census taker. From Centerville. That&#39;s why I&#39;m here.&quot;</font></p><p><font face="book antiqua,palatino" size="3">&quot;Hmm.&quot; is all I said.</font></p><p><a href="http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/tuesday-october-9-in-class-writing-census-taker">read more</a></p> http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/tuesday-october-9-in-class-writing-census-taker#comment Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:36:25 -0700 D 131 at http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody ARCHIVE - Friday Sept 28; Evergreen Bookstore; Spacey Space-Alien Anthropologist (From Space) http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/friday-sept-28-evergreen-bookstore-spacey-space-alien-anthropologist-from-space <p><font face="impact,chicago" size="3" color="#0099ff">What is this space?</font></p><p><font face="impact,chicago" size="3" color="#0099ff">Full of objects physical, stacked and organized, rows and aisles, labeled, branded; a system of order. A temporary affront to <font color="#000000">entropy</font>. Also a transient victory over <font color="#ff6600">chaos</font>. Thus a place of interest, of necessary observation, examination, analysis, synthesis, legend, myth, worship, and perhaps conquest. <br /></font> </p><p><font face="impact,chicago" size="3" color="#0099ff">Has chance or intent created this arrangement of matter in space? See here the fluid, fluidious creature putting this here and that there. A staggered stack, straightened; a misplaced piece, reset; a fallen object, resurrected. Only consciousness is so audacious as to impose order upon a universe where the relentless destruction of order is immutable law. </font></p><p><font face="impact,chicago" size="3" color="#0099ff">Movement of these (presumed) conscious creatures : grabbing and nabbing and picking and touching these objects in rows and aisles. Sometimes taking, keeping, holding some piece against their body. Then a trade, an exchange, green paper or many-colored plastic. And a machine that eats these. And a creature that tames the machine that eats these. The plastic is regurgitated. Something has been gained and something has been lost. But what? The audacity of imposed order is inevitably coupled with the expectancy of <font color="#663333">purpose</font>. What is this <font color="#663300">purpose</font>?</font> </p> http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody/friday-sept-28-evergreen-bookstore-spacey-space-alien-anthropologist-from-space#comment Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:16:00 -0700 D 100 at http://www2.evergreen.edu/fashioningthebody