Feedback for Web Curriculum Projects
Choose Project
1: Adam
2: Adelle
3: Amanda H.
4: Amada P.
5: Amara
6: Angella Redman
7: Angie Russell
8: Anna
9: April
10: Ava
11: Bridget
12: Bruce
13: Carlee
14: Carolyn
15: Casey C.
16: Casey M.
17: Cassidy
18: Catherine A.
19: Catherine P.
20: Charesaa
21: Charlie
22: Christina
23: Clayton
24: Collins
25: Connor
26: Danny
27: Elysse
28: Jaclyn B.
29: Jacqueline M.
30: Jared G.
31: Jared K.
32: Jax
33: Jen
34: Jesseka
35: Johann
36: Jonisha
37: Justin
38: Kathryn
39: Kuniaki
Find Your Name
Amada Lang
Audrey Perry
Audrey Sharp
Autumn Sheldon
Brian Eggleson
Connie Miller
Dusti Eide
Elisabeth Wakcher
Erin Taylor
Fran McClurken
Gray Crawford
Guy Simpson
Heidi Haynes
Jennifer St.Pierre
Jamie Sullivan
James Horne
Kate Franklin
Kelli Fisher
Laura Handy
Laura Wolff
Lisa Huguley
Luanne Hicks
Marlee Riggin
Mindy Cinqmars
Nicolle Gilsdorf
Pam Earnest
Rachel Pankowski
Rachel Street
Sacha Muller
Sara Lewis
Sean Riley
Sis La Vigne
Susan Crownheart
Victoria Benson
Johannes Limberger
Masao Sugiyama
Web Site Design
Inappropriate:
Aesthetics (pictures, text, pictures, layout) obscured the message and the page layouts were inconsistent.
Emerging:
Aesthetics (pictures, text, pictures, layout) obscured the message or the page layouts were inconsistent.
Developing:
Page was lacking one of the required features.
Skilled:
Colors were aesthetically pleasing, pages were consistently laid out, pictures were relevant and useful.
Comment:
Web Site Navigation
I
nappropriate:
Navigation was unclear and everything was hard to find.
Emerging:
Navigation was confusing and most information was hard to find.
Developing:
Navigation was clear and most information was easy to find.
Skilled:
Navigation was intuitive and the information was easy to find.
Comment:
Content
Inappropriate:
Content age level seemed inappropriate and content did not seem useful.
Emerging:
Content age level of many of the sites seemed inappropriate and content of many of the sites was not useful.
Developing:
Content age level of most of the sites was appropriate and the content was useful.
Skilled:
Content age level was clearly appropriate to the age level and content was appropriate and relevant.
Comment:
Annotations
Inappropriate:
Most annotations were missing or contained minimal or misleading information about the web site
Emerging:
Many annotations did not contain useful information and were missing required elements.
Developing:
Annotations were clear, gave a critique of the site but some were missing one or more of the required elements
Skilled:
Annotations were clear, useful, gave a useful critique of the cite and contained all of the required featutes
Comment:
Ethics Section
Comment on the usefulness and effectiveness of the Ethics section of the web site:
Lesson Plan - indicate the level of the lesson plan you are reviewing
Elementary
Middle School
High School
Lesson Plan's Relation to Web Page
Inappropriate:
Lesson has nothing to do with web page.
Emerging:
Lesson is related to the web page but the connections are not clear.
Developing:
Lesson uses the web page but the use seems superficial.
Skilled:
The web page is clearly a integral component to the lesson.
Lesson Plan's Objectives:
Inappropriate:
Objectives aren't tied to state (or national) standards and aren't clear and assessable.
Emerging:
Objectives aren't tied to state (or national) standards and aren't clearly assessable.
Developing:
Objectives are tied to state (or national) standards or easily assessable but not both.
Skilled:
Objectives are tied to state (or national) standards dan are easily assessable.
Lesson Plan's Activities
Inappropriate:
Activities do not seem to help students construct knowledge and seem to have very little to do with objectives.
Emerging:
Activities are not constructivist or do not seem to lead students toward objectives.
Developing:
Activities seem to be constructivist and be related to the objectives but are not specific.
Skilled:
Activities are clearly constructivist and clearly lead students to success on objectives.
Lesson Plan's Multicultural Content
Inappropriate:
Multicultural content was minimal or nonexistent
Emerging:
Multiculutral content used the contributions approach
Developing:
Multicultural content used the additive approach
Skilled:
Multicultural content used the transformative or social aciton approach
Lesson Plan's Accommodation Plan
Inappropriate:
Accommodation plan was minimal or nonexistent
Emerging:
Accommodation plan was vague about special needs and about teaching strategies.
Developing:
Accommodation plan refered to specific special needs but was vague about teaching strategies
Skilled:
Accommodation plan refered to specific special needs and used an appropriate teaching strategy.
Lesson Plan's Assessments
Inappropriate:
Assessments have very little to do with the objectives.
Emerging:
Assessments and objectives seem to be related.
Developing:
Assessments and objectives are clearly related but assessments do not assess student progress toward objectives.
Skilled:
Assessments are clearly tied to objectives and assess student progress toward objectives.
Comment on Lesson Plan