Tribe Apart Response Rubric
Part II: Making Contact
Weak |
OK |
Good |
|
Methodology |
Does not adequately represent all steps in the methodology |
Accurately represents most steps in the research methodology |
Accurately represents all steps in the research methodology |
Ability to critique methodology |
Little to no elaboration of critique criteria, relies on personal opinion rather than research |
Shows some ability to use research criteria for critique |
Shows ability to use research criteria to critique, and elaborated, integrated thinking |
Findings |
Response shows little or some understanding of reading, may contain incomplete or inaccurate reporting of findings. Minimal engagement with the text/task |
Response shows relatively close reading and accurate reporting of findings. Average engagement with the text/task |
Response shows excellent close reading, accuracy of findings and thoughtful elaboration. Above average engagement with the text/task |
Ability to identify significant reading passages, questions, and answers |
Question does not show clear purpose Answers not well anticipated. |
Question has clear purpose Answers are somewhat anticipated |
Questions show clear purpose Answers are well anticipated |
Ability to apply research findings to own teaching |
Applies findings superficially, or over-generalized to teaching, no elaboration |
Applies findings in concrete ways |
Applies findings in concrete, thorough and elaborated ways |