This program is for people who are interested in pursuing teaching as a career choice or who are interested in schooling and equity. During winter quarter, we will continue to study developmental psychology and will also look at the economic and socio-political settings within which schools operate. We will explore school governance and finance and look at alternative approaches to organizing and funding schools. We will also investigate alternative teaching models.
Program activities will include interactive lectures and workshops, seminars, book response papers and small group projects. Students' work in the program will be assessed through written papers, participation in all activities and projects, exams and a final portfolio. Faculty require regular attendance, punctuality and timely completion of all assigned work
Faculty
Core Connector Program Secretaries
Writing Tutors
Meeting Schedule
In addition, all students will spend three hours per week in a school classroom observing and helping the teacher.
Learning Goals for Winter Quarter
1. To understand basics of economics, how decisions are made in the private and public sectors, the nature of taxation and how schools are funded.
2. To continue to consider theories of psychological development and how those theories relate to alternative approaches to teaching and learning.
3. To learn about and practice applications of alternative learning strategies.
4. To consider depictions of schools and schooling in films and how these depictions might inform teachers and teaching.
5. To master computing skills that facilitate communication and the presentation and analysis of quantitative information
6. To gain mastery of basic study and learning skills as a foundation for more advanced college work. These skills include writing, oral expression and critical thinking.
Program Assignments
Following are brief summaries of assignments for the program. More details on each assignment will be presented in class.
1. Philosophy of Education Paper – Each student will write a statement of her or his own philosophy of education. First drafts are due at the end of the second week of class (Thursday, Jan 19) and are to be posted on WebX. About every two weeks, students will reconsider their philosophies based on program activities and on assigned seminar readings of the prior two weeks. These reconsiderations will take the form of short (three to five pages) essays and will be due at 1 pm Thursdays of weeks 4, 6 and 8. Final educational philosophy papers will be due in week 10.
2. Seminar Response Papers – In weeks 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 students will write short (two or three paragraphs) responses to the assigned seminar books. These are due by 1 pm Thursdays.
3. Web Site/Electronic Portfolio – Each student will maintain her or his personal web page related to participation in the program. All work for the quarter will be collected on these web pages in the form of an e-portfolio. Faculty will use the portfolios in writing end-of-quarter evaluations. Web sites and e-portfolios are due on Wednesday of week 10.
4. Wednesday Workshop stuff – See Handouts for particular assignments.
5. Reflective Teacher, Part II – Students will continue to work on the autobiographical papers that they started in fall quarter. Focus of work on those papers for winter quarter will be on how the qualities that define them as people might be assets or, more importantly, liabilities to them as teachers. Rough draft due in Week 6. Final draft due in week 9.
6. Final Exam on Economics and School Finance – There will be a comprehensive final, in-class examination on the economics and school finance materials that we cover during the quarter. Students will draft possible exam questions related to the activities of the Monday morning workshops. These questions will be posted on WebX by 5 pm Friday of each week. Each student will review and comment on two other students’ questions. In addition, since there is no textbook for the economics/finance workshops, students must take good notes. Faculty may ask periodically to see those notes.
7. Assigned Readings – Students must read and be prepared to discuss the assigned readings on days shown on the program schedule. In addition to scheduled readings, faculty may add other materials on occasion.
8. Computer Workshops – Computer workshops will focus on applications of spreadsheets and will include presentation and analysis of quantitative information related to schools and schooling. Products of the workshops will be turned in and/or added to e-portfolios. Time will also be available for additional work on web pages and portfolios.
9. Other – Faculty may add, change or delete assignments as the quarter progresses.
Program Book List
Arends, Richard I. (1996). Classroom Instruction and Management. Burr Ridge: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 9780070030824 0070030820
Delpit, Lisa D. (1996) Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. New York: New Press. ISBN: 9781565841802 1565841808
Dewey, John (1997) Experience and Education. New York: Free Press. ISBN: 9780684838281 0684838281
Flores-Gonzalez, Nilda (2002) School Kids/Street Kids: Identity Development in Latino Students. New York: Teachers College Press. ISBN: 9780807742235 0807742236
Gardner, Howard (2004) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. ISBN: 9780465025107 0465025102
Kohl, Herbert (1995) I Won't Learn from You: And Other Thoughts on Creative Maladjustment. New York: New Press. ISBN: 1565840968
Kozol, Jonathan (1992) Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools. New York: Perennial. ISBN: 9780060974992 0060974990
Miller, Patricia A. (2001) Theories of Developmental Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers. ISBN: 9780716728467 071672846X [Carryover from Fall Quarter]
Nieto, Sonia (2003) What Keeps Teachers Going? New York: Teachers College Press. ISBN: 9780807743119 0807743119
Program Covenant
As a learning community, faculty and students in So You Want to be a Teacher acknowledge that community does not just "happen." It is up to us to create our own learning community and to strive to maintain community vitality. As such, we have responsibilities to ourselves, and to the group. It is important that the duties and responsibilities of faculty and students are clearly understood. Those responsibilities are described here and constitute a covenant among community members.
Expectations of Faculty
The learning community can expect faculty members to:
1. Attend a faculty seminar and business meeting each week ready to participate.
2. Be prepared for lectures, workshops and other activities as scheduled by the faculty team.
3. Help facilitate book seminars each week.
4. Attend all program activities required of the entire group of students when not ill or absent for professional or religious reasons.
5. Give prompt and meaningful feedback to all student assignments.
6. Be available to students during posted office hours or by appointment.
7. Give students feedback throughout the quarter so that written evaluations are not a surprise.
8. Notify students by the end of the 5th week if their work‑to‑date does not meet the requirements for full credit.
9. Write an evaluation for each assigned student.
10. Participate in the administrative business of the program as agreed to by the faculty team.
11. Continually work to create a community that respects differences and encourages an environment where students and faculty can learn with and from each other.
12. Abide by Evergreen's social contract.
Expectations of Students
The learning community can expect students to:
1. Attend all class meetings on time and to stay for the entire class period. Any absences can lead to reduced credit. Faculty will take roll.
2. Prepare fully for all classes, seminars and program activities by completing the readings, reflecting on the readings and thoughtfully designing questions and comments about the readings. Students will put the same careful attention into their writing. All written work will be typed, double‑spaced and proofread before submission and will conform to the APA handbook.
3. Have the assigned books, read them and bring them to class. Students who do not have books with them at a workshop or discussion may be asked to leave and may, as a result, lose credit.
4. Complete all written work and assignments on time.
5. Engage fully in all classes, seminars and program activities by generating and sharing ideas and critiques as well as listening actively and encouraging others to generate and share their ideas and critiques.
6. Consult with their seminar leader whenever they need clarification about any aspect of the program, the readings or other activities.
7. Write self and faculty evaluations at the end of the quarter. Evaluations of faculty may be submitted to the program secretaries.
8. Meet with seminar leader for evaluation conference at the arranged time.
9. Continually work to create a community that respects and encourages an environment where students and faculty can learn with and from each other.
10. Submit original pieces of work. No plagiarism. Plagiarism is to pass off as one's own the words or ideas of others. Plagiarists could lose credit, be removed from the program and may be required to leave the college. Ask faculty members if you have any questions.
11. Abide by Evergreen's social contract
Academic Standards
By enrolling in the program, you agree to abide by the academic standards outlined below.
· Attendance and Preparation – Attending class and being prepared for program activities are not options; they are mandatory. Faculty will deny credit for absences and for lack of preparation.
· Late Work Policy - We expect all work to be submitted on time. Late submittals communicate to us that you are not keeping up with your work. In all but the most extenuating of circumstances, work that is submitted past its due date and time will not be read by faculty and your evaluation will state that your work was not submitted in a timely fashion. Failure to attend all program meetings or to submit all work could result in a loss of credit.
· Credit Policy - Credit is not the same thing as high quality work. Full credit may be given when students fulfill the college-level requirements and standards of the program. The evaluation is used to describe the quality of the student's work. Thus, a student could actually receive credit, but also receive evaluations that reflect poor quality work. On the flip side, a student could attend regularly but receive partial or no credit because of poor quality or missing work.
· Honesty - It is required that each assignment be an original piece of work for this program (i.e., the piece has never been submitted to or has not been the basis for an assignment in another program). Ideas or written passages that are not yours must be correctly referenced so that credit can accrue to the original sources. In general, documentation is to be in American Psychological Association format, though informal citations are acceptable for some work, at the discretion of the faculty. The APA handbook is available in the library.
Any student who plagiarizes material will lose credit, be asked to leave the program, and may be required to leave the college. Ask your faculty members if you have any questions. The Evergreen library and the Learning Resource Center also have information on plagiarism.
If any situation arises in which there is ambiguity or uncertainty about whether the work fulfills the letter or spirit of Evergreen’s Academic Standards, please bring it to our attention. Failure to adhere to these standards will result in a loss of credit.
Housekeeping
1. Conflict resolution - Although we will all strive to maintain a smooth‑running program, conflict happens and can be healthy if handled well. Resolution of disagreement between a student and a faculty member should be attempted first by the two parties involved, then with the whole faculty team. If resolution cannot be reached at this point, we will use the college's established grievance procedure. Students should strive to resolve conflict between themselves, first, but faculty members are available to act as mediators if needed.
2. Evaluations - Students will be evaluated by their seminar leader, but contributions from the other faculty member will be solicited and welcomed.
3. Credit - Credit is not the same thing as high quality work. Full credit may be given when students fulfill the college-level requirements and standards of the program. The evaluation is used to describe the QUALITY of the student's work. Thus, a student could actually receive credit, but also receive evaluations that reflect poor quality work. On the flip side, a student could attend regularly but receive partial or no credit because of poor quality or missing work.
4. Partial credit - This program awards 16‑quarter hours for the quarter. Reduction of credit requires the consensus of the entire faculty team.
5. Expulsion from the program - A student may be asked to leave the program if his or her behavior is consistently disruptive, antagonistic and impedes the program from progressing. Any student who is asked to leave and wishes to appeal may do so by arranging to meet with the entire faculty team. The team's decision will be binding, although students always have access to the college's grievance procedures.
A student's registration in this program indicates his or her willingness to abide by these duties and responsibilities.