Mass Production

Submitted by chijes12 on Tue, 2007-02-13 06:10.

While reading this manifesto, I couldnt help but think of my prior work in a medium quite suitable for this topic: printmaking.  The point of printmaking is to recreate the same piece of art from the same medium to eventually have a series of identical prints from the same artist.  Many hidden aspects come into play when saying the word identical or original for that matter.  When a printmaker creates a piece, often the printmaker creates something that can withstand a number of inkings and presses but many times the artists has an assitant that actually runs the press and creates the prints.  These many prints then are part of a series.  So where does the complication set in? Do the prints hold any value to the owner because they were printed by an assistant?  Do they hold any value because it is a print of the original work by the artist?  These questions still boggle my mind after many years.

This concept holds true to every medium in this era.  We as a society today still hold the original pieces of art to a certain standard but the poster prints and photos of the originals are becoming just as prestine as the original piece.  As far as the comment in the article about how the prints are lacking one important thing: there presence in time and space.  In contrast to that, I feel that any piece of art created almost transcends time and space in that yes the work is still intact but the social implications of that piece do not stay true.  Referring to "Inside the White Cube" take three blank canvasses in a gallery from different eras and there is already a pre-notion of what should be on that canvas before any brush stroke was even made. So I think that the reproduced image that is taken from the original piece is just as profound as the original.
Jesse Chieffo