History of Science Lecture 2, Fall 2009
http://grace.evergreen.edu/mon
A framework for interpretation
Discuss the reading and the contributions of specific presocratic philosophers
with respect to the following dialectical frameworks.
- Roochnik p 7- Historical dialectic and an organizing narrative.
Flaws and all.
- Each thinker will be conceived as responding to, and is in some sense
shaped by, a previous one.
- A progression of more comprehensive and complex ideas leading to
Aristotle. (Plato for us).
- Matter vs Form - major distinct themes (Guthrie)
- Ionians - Natural Philosophy based on materialistic ontology of matter.
- Pythagoreans (Italian peninsula)- Mystical/Spiritual cults with
reality in an abstract ontology of form.
- Being vs becoming - ontological dualism (Roochnik & others)
- Problems of Motion (Guthrie & others)
- All is in flux. All is becomming and there is no being.
- All is one and there is only being. Motion is an illusion, becomming
is an illusion. Only reason and not senses can inform us of the the truth.
We cannot trust our senses.
- Empiricism vs Rationalism as the basis for knowing
- The Mathematical Order of Nature
- This is for us to fill in. What is the dialectical narrative we call
The Mathematical Order of Nature
Wheelwright p13-14 - Phases of Materialist Natural Philosophy
- Thales and Milsians on Ionian peninsula - Discovery of Nature
- Heraclitus - All is change
- Parmenides and the Eleatics - All is one.
- Qualitative Pluralists - One underlying reality, changing appearances.
- The Sophists - a skeptical outcome of the materialists
- The Pythagorians - a mystical brotherhood that discovered soul and
saw form instead of matter as the answer to the
ontological question. The Pythagoreans believed in transmigration of the soul
(reincarnation).