# Branch

comments_06:
looks to be fused with live and have live parts too?


comments_06:
combined swell of this and live 539 was 35


comments_06:
difficult to get in--soon will be overgrown


comments_06:
bark lifted, influencing diameter measure


comments_06:
azimuth corrected - tons of dicranum on top


comments_06:
above pulley - no additional live branches on mainstem above 1401


comments_06:
the branch divides right at bar and loner branch is dead


comments_06:
marked on the back page in the datasheet


comments_06:
looks in notes like may say dead? Next to it


comments_06:
had extent recorded as 4.2, but not supposed to measure extent so ignored


Comments:
was corrected from 19 to 1.9 based on typo


Comments:
*was corrected from 28 to 2.8 based on verification in the book


comments_06:
new branch ? No location given - on p. 5 of datasheet - ht 70.3-79.6


comments_06:
reiteration - no additional info provided


comments_06:
reiteration - no additional data provided


comments_06:
new branches on 542 - assuming they are epicormic based on location


Comments:
corrected live extent from typo of 55 based on rite in rain book


Comments:
extension error of 34.4 corrected to 4.4


Comments:
extension error corrected from 21.4 to 1.4


Comments:
No living foliage other than on REIT #287


Comments:
diameter of several branches together (epicormic spray)


Comments:
live_axis length corrected from 38.5 to 8.5


Comments:
azimuth is recorded as 558 in the book - which is clearly wrong, so deleted azimuth


Comments:
updated based on rite in rain book 15, p. 42 - not recorded as epicormic


Comments:
updated based on rite in rain book 15 p 42


Comments:
updated based on rite in rain book 15, p. 42


Comments:
based on rite in rain book 15, p. 41 epi/original status was updated


Comments:
centroid azimuth typo corrected from 385 based on rite in rain book


Comments:
mostly dead staub.  One small spray near trunk


Comments:
path=4.0, branch broken 2 mfrom trunk, one of 2 major BIF dead


Comments:
branch broken and hanging vertically - 1.8m from trunk


comments_06:
from 40m tags, Iding branches was confusing--could be numbered wrong


comments_06:
looks to be more like 8.0 m ht rather than 8.3


comments_06:
height corrected to 34.2 in 2006 assessment


comments_06:
was originally recorded as 1.05
, whereas others were in meters, so think this should be meters too


comments_06:
was originally recorded as 1.4, whereas others were in meters, so think this should be meters too


comments_06:
was originally recorded as 3.77, so was in meters rather than cm like all other records


comments_06:
new branch - no diameter recorded though


comments_06:
new branch in 06, but no diameter recorded


comments_06:
new branch formed where an old dead branch was previously


Comments:
no live status provided, percent foliated not complete


Comments:
azimuth recorded as 390 - updated to be 39 degrees based on yellow book


comments_06:
INDIVIDUAL EPICORMICS HAD DIAMETERS OF 4, 4, 3.7, 5


comments_06:
took average of 3 diameters recorded 4.5 5.8 8.3


comments_06:
took average of 3 DIAMETERS 3.6, 3.0, 6.0


comments_06:
took average of 3 DIAMETERS 4.0, 3.3, 4.3


comments_06:
I believe this number is wrong - there is small dead branch underneath that was probably measured with it


comments_06:
marked as live in 2006 2 DIAMETERS 7.1, 8.0


comments_06:
this large original diameter is all the branches fised as there is nothing 18.8 - funky one


comments_06:
This is a reiteration!!!!  Not recorded in 06


comments_06:
2 BRANCHES - THE OTHER HERE IS 6.3, total diameter swelling base was 17.5 cm


Comments:
typo - updated to 7.4 diameter from 47.4


comments_06:
CONFIRMED THAT WAS IN FACT BIGGER VALUE (? MEASURED W/O BARK AND GOT 6.9)


Comments:
centroid distance corrected to 3.2 from 32


Comments:
no slope or slope code provided in the yellow book


# Coarse_woody_debris

Comments:
confirmed that these are the correct in out values


# Decay_class

Description:
bark intact; twigs<3m in diameter present; texture-wood intact; log corss-section round; wood original color, log elevated on support points.


Description:
bark intact; twigs<3m in diameter absent; texture-wood intact to partly soft; log corss-section round; wood original color; log elevated on support points but sagging slightly


Description:
bark loose and missing in places; twigs<3m in diameter absent; texture-wood hard but in large pieces; log corss-section round; wood original color to faded; log sagging and near ground


Description:
bark absent; twigs<3cm in diameter absent; texture-wood chunks small, soft, and blocky; log cross-section round to oval; wood color light to faded brown or yellow; all of log on ground


Description:
bark and twigs<3cm in diameter absent; texture-wood soft and powdery; log cross-section oval; wood color faded to light yellow or gray; all of log on ground


Description:
Recently dead branch with fine branching structure and bark still intact.


Description:
General branching structure remains, but bark is beginning to slough


Description:
Branching structure is mostly gone. Bark is sloughing


Description:
Bark is mostly gone and the exposed wood is beginning to decay.


Description:
Bark is completely gone and the exposed wood is deteriorating.


# Foliar_units

Comments:
don't see this FU in the yellow databooks


Comments:
done see this FU in the yellow data book


Comments:
don't see this FU in the yellow databook


Comments:
2 m from top,  don't see this recorded in yellow book


Comments:
2m from top, don't see this recorded in yellow book


Comments:
don't see a sign of this in the yellow book


Comments:
all diameters were in the azimuth field and updated 5/06


# Measurement_device_type

Description:
2 liter plastic soda bottles with funnels


# Plot_observation_point

Comments:
Observation_point_name is 359903, 359905, or 359912 See comments on sensor.xls)


# Reit_taper

Comments:
distance was corrected from 23 based on yellow book


Comments:
ht corrected from 331.2 to 31.2 based on yellow book


Comments:
lowest vertical piece,distance and azimuth were reversed


Comments:
lowest vertical piece, distance and azimuth were reversed


# Reiteration

Comments:
basal diameter corrected from 107 based on yellow book


Comments:
comes out of trunk and curls; old reit name 211


Comments:
top ht is < top ht - doesn't make sense - an error!


Comments:
2 degree; old reit name 582, top azimuth corrected from 364 to 4 degrees


Comments:
no additional information available in yellow books


Comments:
no additional information available in yellow books, R1 = reiteration on top


Comments:
reit tag 691A stemidcorrected from 340 to 589 5/06


Comments:
reit tag 692A stemidcorrected from 340 to 589 5/06


Comments:
broken top stemidcorrected from 340 to 589 5/06


Comments:
basal diameter corrected from 195 based on yellow book


Comments:
"horseshoe branch/reit" see back of bk 9


Comments:
branch that gave rise to 407A is gone/dead


Comments:
all reits for 'stem id 669 ' were updated to 671 which is the correct stemID


Comments:
70 cm dead top, reiteration top ht corrected from 808 based on yellow book


Comments:
re-calculate branch diameter for 708; it arises from limb past 708A with diameter of 10.2 cm


Comments:
azimuth corrected from 598 based on yellow book


Comments:
parent 229 grp of 4 br; is epi reit; old reit 230


# Shrubs

Comments:
site corrected from PL, date corrected from 8/22/2000


Comments:
Site corrected from CH, plot ID updated from 11


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 31


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 24


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 38


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 26


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 27


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 28


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 29


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 33


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 34


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 36


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 37


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 35


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 32


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 30


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 25


Comments:
plot type corrected, site corrected from CH


Comments:
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH


Comments:
Site corrected from CH, plot ID updated from 12


# Site

Access_Directions:
see information packet for researchers available for download from website

Access_Restrictions:
see information packet for researchers available for download from website

Comments:
Aggregate values from Van Pelt and Nadkarni 2004


# Species

Comments:
Is no longer Berberis, but instead Mahonia, MANE2 in plants database


Comments:
Castanopsis chrysophylla not accepted by IT IS - CHCHC4 in plants db


Comments:
most likely Pacific dogwood, but not confirmed in the field


Comments:
most likely elderberry, but not confirmed in the field


Comments:
was recorded in MC originally as species 54


Comments:
updated to Frangula from Rhamnus - rhamnus no longer accepted by IT IS


Comments:
callicarpa not accepted by IT IS - updated to racemosa - plants database uses SARAR3


Comments:
This is a species that could not be identified in the field


Comments:
according to plants DB, this is not found in WA


# Stem

Comment:
Height=*, top snapped @1.4m thick total height 48.4


Comment:
top broken @10cm/leaner, ht corrected from 6.5 in yellow book


Comment:
Height was given as 7.7 - clearly an error!, height was corrected based on book 25 which shows the top height of 78.2, dbh corrected from 249 based on stem taper msmt


Comment:
ht corrected from 52.6 to reflect detailed stem taper ht measurement, and dbh updated from 122.8


Comment:
height was corrected based on 70 psme, differs from stem taper b/c top ht is based on reiteration


Comment:
stem height corrected from 60 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
stem height corrected from 44.8 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
Top snapped @ 30cm, height was corrected based on 70 psme


Comment:
top snapped @ 36m/ 80cm/resprouted, stem height updated to reflect detailed measurements of taper


Comment:
stem height corrected from 41.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
Top 7m dead, height was corrected based on 70 psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 54.4 to reflect detailed stem taper ht measurement


Comment:
Top 9m dead, height was corrected based on 70 psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 58.9 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 163.2


Comment:
stem height corrected from 55.2 based on stem taper detailed measurements


Comment:
ht corrected from 51.4 based on stem taper value


Comment:
reiteration starts @4.6m , 15m spike top


Comment:
dbh updated from 87.2 based on stem taper


Comment:
dbh updated from 77.4 based on stem taper msmt


Comment:
dead spike 1m, dbh corrected from 152.4 based on rite in rain book stem taper


Comment:
splits into two @8m, this is the ht is of the shorter trunk, diameter updated from 136.9 to reflect stem taper msmt


Comment:
stem height corrected from 50.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh update from 94.7


Comment:
crown base is recorded as 29.2 - must be incorrect as height of tree is 28.8


Comment:
height was corrected based on 70 psme and rite in rain book, as was dbh


Comment:
two reiterations coming off of the top - one 64.1 m (1524) the other one 63.3 m (1513)


Comment:
stem height corrected from 57.4 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
top height corrected from 69 to reflect the upper height of the reiteration which is why this differs from stem taper


Comment:
stem height corrected from 50.1 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
stem height corrected from 53.3  to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
ht corrected from 66.6 based on stem taper detailed measurement of height


Comment:
height corrected from 78.1 based on 70psme and yellow book, dbh changed from 222.2 based on 70PSME


Comment:
dbh corrected from 222.2 based on 70psme and yellow book, and height corrected from based on yellow book - although yellow book says it's 82.0 not .6, dbh corrected from 212.8

Rite_in_Rain_book:
Book 9 (51 - 53 became 62), epicormic end book 15


Comment:
height corrected from 77.6 based on yellow book and 70psme, dbh corrected from 240.6 based on 70PSME

Rite_in_Rain_book:
Book 23 (61 became 70), book 15 p42 epicormic stat


Comment:
recorded as CR stem 70 in the yellow book, height corrected from 53.4 based on yellow book top ht of reiteration, different from stem taper height, b/c uppermost ht is of reiteration, not main stem


Comment:
dbh corrected from yellow book and 70 psme from 190.7, crown height and radii updated based on datasheet


Comment:
crown base and crown radii corrected based on datasheet, ht corrected from 73.7 based on datasheets


Comment:
height corrected from 81.4 based on yellow book, and dbh corrected from 183.3


Comment:
ht corrected from55.7 based on stem taper rite in rain


Comment:
height corrected from 70.3 based on yellow book and 70psme, dbh corrected from 129.1, was marked as 662 in the stem taper table - updated 5/06


Comment:
height corrected from 79.6 based on yellow book and 70psme, dbh corrected from 190.9


Comment:
stem height corrected from 44.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
stem height corrected from 58.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
on 4/4/06 visit this tree had fallen over


Comment:
moved- map, ht corrected from 75.5, crown base and crown radii corrected based on datasheet


Comment:
ht corrected from 26.6, crown base and radii corrected based on datasheet


Comment:
Y=-4.8, dbh corrected from 49.1 based on yellow book


Comment:
it was 311, not 312 that was climbed and had branch data collected on it, ht corrected from 39.8 based on 70psme, dbh corrected from 43.8


Comment:
all heights above 31.0 m had to be corrected by 0.3 m (31.3 corrected to 31.0 etc.),  total ht corrected to 50.1 m from 50.4, dbh corrected from 68.1 based on yellow book


Comment:
dbh corrected from 53.5 based on 70 psme


Comment:
labeled PSME #76 in the yellow book, dbh corrected from 72.9 based on 70 psme


Comment:
dbh corrected from 54.2 based on 70 psme


Comment:
dbh corrected from 41.7 based on 70 psme


Comment:
had error in y location - updated from -66


Comment:
Specie=ABPR, corrected from TSHE based on datasheet


Comment:
ht or dbh are likely not correct - seems wrong but can't locate original datasheet to verify


Comment:
ht corrected from 66.7 based on yellow book and 70psme, and dbh corrected from 135.9


Comment:
ht corrected from 65.1 based on yellow book and 70psme, and dbh corrected from 107.4


Comment:
ht corrected from 63 based on yellow book, 70psme recorded ht as .5 rather than .3, dbh corrected from 132.3


Comment:
ht corrected from 61.8 based on yellow book and 70psme, and dbh corrected from 113.1


Comment:
ht corrected from 64.1 based on yellow book and 70 psme, and dbh corrected from 122.4


Comment:
ht corrected from 66 based on yellow book and 70psme, and dbh corrected from 140


Comment:
stem height corrected from 49.5 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh corrected from 84.6


Comment:
ht corrected from 54.3 basedon yellow book and 70 psme, and dbh corrected from 86.7


Comment:
had in the stem tag field "176/170" corrected to 176, ht corrected from 54.2 based on yellow book and 70psme, and dbh corrected from 97.4


Comment:
stem height corrected from 43.7 based on stem taper detailed measurements, and dbh updated from 64.4, crown base and radii corrected from datasheet


Comment:
crown base and crown radii corrected based on datasheet


Comment:
ht corrected from 54, and dbh corrected from 85.5 based on 70 psme and rite in the rain book


Comment:
ht corrected from 54.7, and dbh corrected from 94.6 based on 70 psme and rite in the rain


Comment:
ht corrected from 49.1, and dbh from 89 based on 70 psme and rite in the rain


Comment:
height was recorded as 88, but clearly must be decimal error so updated to 8.8


Comment:
ht correctedf from 45.6, and dbh from 57.7 based on 70 psme and rite in the rain


Comment:
ht corrected from 50.8, dbh from 101, based on 70psme


Comment:
This is BVP's stem 16, ht corrected from 46.9, dbh from 75.7, based on 70psme


Comment:
This is BVP's stem 20, ht corrected from 49.7, dbh corrected from 90.8, based on 70psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 46.9, and dbh from 76.2, based on 70psme and rite in rain book


Comment:
ht corrected from 48.6, dbh corrected from 79 based on 70psme and rite in rain book


Comment:
ht corrected from 46.2, dbh corrected from 87 based on 70psme and rite in rain book


Comment:
ht corrected from 48.4, dbh corrected from 69.2 based on 70 PSME


Comment:
ht corrected from 40, dbh corrected from 46.8, based on 70 PSME and rite in the rain book


Comment:
ht corrected from 52.4, dbh corrected from 93.3, based on 70 psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 45.2, dbh corrected from 71.4, based on 70 PSME


Comment:
this tree did not have branch data collected for it, but the TSHE that was just outside the stand (now id-379) did


Comment:
Y=4.1, ht corrected from 48.2, dbh corrected from 79.6, base don 70psme and rite in the rain books


Comment:
crown base and radii corrected, New DBH=51.4, ht corrected from 18.9, updated from datasheet,


Comment:
ht corrected from 40.5,crown base and radii corrected,


Comment:
not originally included - just outside transect


Comment:
height from PSME errorCk17.xls - seems to match with this stem, book 7 (stem 59 - only taper and fuzz - there are no branch measuremenst for this one, dbh updated from 18.5 based on stem taper


Comment:
stem height corrected from 43.5 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 103.6


Comment:
dbh corrected based on stem taper msmt from 83.4


Comment:
ht corrected from 42.3, dbh corrected from 96.8 based on 70psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 43, dbh corrected from 106.9, based on 70 psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 49.2, dbh corrected from 130.8, based on 70 psme


Comment:
height corrected from 41 based on stem taper detailed measurement, and dbh corrected from 71.3


Comment:
ht corrected from 49.1, dbh corrected from 114.2, based on 70psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 50, dbh corrected from 154.9, based on 70psme and rite in rain


Comment:
height corrected from 47.8 to 48.8 based on yellow book, and dbh updated from 105.8 based on stem taper


Comment:
North is an estimate, ht corrected from 43.3, dbh corrected from 98.5, based on 70 psme and rite in rain


Comment:
ht corrected from 50.3, dbh corrected from 112, based on 70psme, different from stem taper b/c top ht is the ht of a reiteration


Comment:
stem height corrected from 46.5 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 90.8


Comment:
ht corrected from 52.5, dbh corrected from 126, based on 70 psme, differs from taper top height, b/c top height of stem is a reiteration


Comment:
ht corrected from 52.6, dbh corrected from 118.9, based on 70 psme, different from stem taper b/c uppermost ht is a reiteration


Comment:
stem height corrected from 36.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 52.5


Comment:
ht corrected from 56.1, dbh corrected from 170.4, based on 70 psme


Comment:
dbh was updated 5/06 as it was entered as 63, but when visited on site saw that it was actually 6.3 and decimal had been ignored


# Stem_tally

Comments:
category is <2cm and 2.1-3.9 cm for the tally


# Stem_taper

Comments:
these records were in duplicate for st 103 as st 2


Comments:
no data for 5 m for main trunk - there is a reiteration that is bigger that has a d= 118.9 at 5m


Comments:
had diameter of 591, but this was circumference, therefore updated 5/06


Comments:
updated to stemID 674 as was incorrect 5/06


Comments:
entered from book 7 - no branch data collected for this stem - only taper and fuzz


