# Branch

Comments:
live_axis length corrected from 38.5 to 8.5


Comments:
azimuth is recorded as 558 in the book - which is clearly wrong, so deleted azimuth


Comments:
updated based on rite in rain book 15, p. 42 - not recorded as epicormic


Comments:
updated based on rite in rain book 15 p 42


Comments:
updated based on rite in rain book 15, p. 42


Comments:
based on rite in rain book 15, p. 41 epi/original status was updated


Comments:
centroid azimuth typo corrected from 385 based on rite in rain book


Comments:
mostly dead staub.  One small spray near trunk


Comments:
path=4.0, branch broken 2 mfrom trunk, one of 2 major BIF dead


Comments:
branch broken and hanging vertically - 1.8m from trunk


# Decay_class

Description:
bark intact; twigs<3m in diameter present; texture-wood intact; log corss-section round; wood original color, log elevated on support points.


Description:
bark intact; twigs<3m in diameter absent; texture-wood intact to partly soft; log corss-section round; wood original color; log elevated on support points but sagging slightly


Description:
bark loose and missing in places; twigs<3m in diameter absent; texture-wood hard but in large pieces; log corss-section round; wood original color to faded; log sagging and near ground


Description:
bark absent; twigs<3cm in diameter absent; texture-wood chunks small, soft, and blocky; log cross-section round to oval; wood color light to faded brown or yellow; all of log on ground


Description:
bark and twigs<3cm in diameter absent; texture-wood soft and powdery; log cross-section oval; wood color faded to light yellow or gray; all of log on ground


Description:
Recently dead branch with fine branching structure and bark still intact.


Description:
General branching structure remains, but bark is beginning to slough


Description:
Branching structure is mostly gone. Bark is sloughing


Description:
Bark is mostly gone and the exposed wood is beginning to decay.


Description:
Bark is completely gone and the exposed wood is deteriorating.


# Foliar_units

Comments:
2 m from top,  don't see this recorded in yellow book


Comments:
2m from top, don't see this recorded in yellow book


# Measurement_device_type

Description:
2 liter plastic soda bottles with funnels


# Reit_taper

Comments:
distance was corrected from 23 based on yellow book


Comments:
ht corrected from 331.2 to 31.2 based on yellow book


Comments:
lowest vertical piece,distance and azimuth were reversed


Comments:
lowest vertical piece, distance and azimuth were reversed


# Reiteration

Comments:
reit tag 691A stemidcorrected from 340 to 589 5/06


Comments:
reit tag 692A stemidcorrected from 340 to 589 5/06


Comments:
broken top stemidcorrected from 340 to 589 5/06


Comments:
basal diameter corrected from 195 based on yellow book


Comments:
"horseshoe branch/reit" see back of bk 9


Comments:
branch that gave rise to 407A is gone/dead


Comments:
all reits for 'stem id 669 ' were updated to 671 which is the correct stemID


Comments:
70 cm dead top, reiteration top ht corrected from 808 based on yellow book


Comments:
re-calculate branch diameter for 708; it arises from limb past 708A with diameter of 10.2 cm


Comments:
azimuth corrected from 598 based on yellow book


# Shrubs

Comments:
Site corrected from CH, plot ID updated from 11


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 31


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 24


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 38


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 26


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 27


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 28


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 29


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 33


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 34


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 36


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 37


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 35


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 32


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 30


Comments:
corrected from CH, plot type updated from 25


Comments:
plot type corrected, site corrected from CH


Comments:
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH
site corrected from CH


Comments:
Site corrected from CH, plot ID updated from 12


# Site

Access_Directions:
see information packet for researchers available for download from website

Access_Restrictions:
see information packet for researchers available for download from website

Comments:
Aggregate values from Van Pelt and Nadkarni 2004


# Species

Comments:
Is no longer Berberis, but instead Mahonia, MANE2 in plants database


Comments:
Castanopsis chrysophylla not accepted by IT IS - CHCHC4 in plants db


Comments:
most likely Pacific dogwood, but not confirmed in the field


Comments:
most likely elderberry, but not confirmed in the field


Comments:
was recorded in MC originally as species 54


Comments:
updated to Frangula from Rhamnus - rhamnus no longer accepted by IT IS


Comments:
callicarpa not accepted by IT IS - updated to racemosa - plants database uses SARAR3


Comments:
This is a species that could not be identified in the field


Comments:
according to plants DB, this is not found in WA


# Stem

Comment:
crown base is recorded as 29.2 - must be incorrect as height of tree is 28.8


Comment:
height was corrected based on 70 psme and rite in rain book, as was dbh


Comment:
two reiterations coming off of the top - one 64.1 m (1524) the other one 63.3 m (1513)


Comment:
stem height corrected from 57.4 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
top height corrected from 69 to reflect the upper height of the reiteration which is why this differs from stem taper


Comment:
stem height corrected from 50.1 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
stem height corrected from 53.3  to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
ht corrected from 66.6 based on stem taper detailed measurement of height


Comment:
height corrected from 78.1 based on 70psme and yellow book, dbh changed from 222.2 based on 70PSME


Comment:
dbh corrected from 222.2 based on 70psme and yellow book, and height corrected from based on yellow book - although yellow book says it's 82.0 not .6, dbh corrected from 212.8

Rite_in_Rain_book:
Book 9 (51 - 53 became 62), epicormic end book 15


Comment:
height corrected from 77.6 based on yellow book and 70psme, dbh corrected from 240.6 based on 70PSME

Rite_in_Rain_book:
Book 23 (61 became 70), book 15 p42 epicormic stat


Comment:
recorded as CR stem 70 in the yellow book, height corrected from 53.4 based on yellow book top ht of reiteration, different from stem taper height, b/c uppermost ht is of reiteration, not main stem


Comment:
dbh corrected from yellow book and 70 psme from 190.7, crown height and radii updated based on datasheet


Comment:
crown base and crown radii corrected based on datasheet, ht corrected from 73.7 based on datasheets


Comment:
height corrected from 81.4 based on yellow book, and dbh corrected from 183.3


Comment:
ht corrected from55.7 based on stem taper rite in rain


Comment:
height corrected from 70.3 based on yellow book and 70psme, dbh corrected from 129.1, was marked as 662 in the stem taper table - updated 5/06


Comment:
height corrected from 79.6 based on yellow book and 70psme, dbh corrected from 190.9


Comment:
stem height corrected from 44.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
stem height corrected from 58.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement


Comment:
on 4/4/06 visit this tree had fallen over


Comment:
moved- map, ht corrected from 75.5, crown base and crown radii corrected based on datasheet


Comment:
ht corrected from 26.6, crown base and radii corrected based on datasheet


# Stem_taper

Comments:
had diameter of 591, but this was circumference, therefore updated 5/06


Comments:
updated to stemID 674 as was incorrect 5/06


