# Branch

comments_06:
INDIVIDUAL EPICORMICS HAD DIAMETERS OF 4, 4, 3.7, 5


comments_06:
took average of 3 diameters recorded 4.5 5.8 8.3


comments_06:
took average of 3 DIAMETERS 3.6, 3.0, 6.0


comments_06:
took average of 3 DIAMETERS 4.0, 3.3, 4.3


comments_06:
I believe this number is wrong - there is small dead branch underneath that was probably measured with it


comments_06:
marked as live in 2006 2 DIAMETERS 7.1, 8.0


comments_06:
this large original diameter is all the branches fised as there is nothing 18.8 - funky one


comments_06:
This is a reiteration!!!!  Not recorded in 06


comments_06:
2 BRANCHES - THE OTHER HERE IS 6.3, total diameter swelling base was 17.5 cm


Comments:
typo - updated to 7.4 diameter from 47.4


comments_06:
CONFIRMED THAT WAS IN FACT BIGGER VALUE (? MEASURED W/O BARK AND GOT 6.9)


Comments:
centroid distance corrected to 3.2 from 32


Comments:
no slope or slope code provided in the yellow book


# Decay_class

Description:
bark intact; twigs<3m in diameter present; texture-wood intact; log corss-section round; wood original color, log elevated on support points.


Description:
bark intact; twigs<3m in diameter absent; texture-wood intact to partly soft; log corss-section round; wood original color; log elevated on support points but sagging slightly


Description:
bark loose and missing in places; twigs<3m in diameter absent; texture-wood hard but in large pieces; log corss-section round; wood original color to faded; log sagging and near ground


Description:
bark absent; twigs<3cm in diameter absent; texture-wood chunks small, soft, and blocky; log cross-section round to oval; wood color light to faded brown or yellow; all of log on ground


Description:
bark and twigs<3cm in diameter absent; texture-wood soft and powdery; log cross-section oval; wood color faded to light yellow or gray; all of log on ground


Description:
Recently dead branch with fine branching structure and bark still intact.


Description:
General branching structure remains, but bark is beginning to slough


Description:
Branching structure is mostly gone. Bark is sloughing


Description:
Bark is mostly gone and the exposed wood is beginning to decay.


Description:
Bark is completely gone and the exposed wood is deteriorating.


# Measurement_device_type

Description:
2 liter plastic soda bottles with funnels


# Plot_observation_point

Comments:
Observation_point_name is 359903, 359905, or 359912 See comments on sensor.xls)


# Reiteration

Comments:
parent 229 grp of 4 br; is epi reit; old reit 230


# Site

Access_Directions:
see information packet for researchers available for download from website

Access_Restrictions:
see information packet for researchers available for download from website

Comments:
Aggregate values from Van Pelt and Nadkarni 2004


# Species

Comments:
Is no longer Berberis, but instead Mahonia, MANE2 in plants database


Comments:
Castanopsis chrysophylla not accepted by IT IS - CHCHC4 in plants db


Comments:
most likely Pacific dogwood, but not confirmed in the field


Comments:
most likely elderberry, but not confirmed in the field


Comments:
was recorded in MC originally as species 54


Comments:
updated to Frangula from Rhamnus - rhamnus no longer accepted by IT IS


Comments:
callicarpa not accepted by IT IS - updated to racemosa - plants database uses SARAR3


Comments:
This is a species that could not be identified in the field


Comments:
according to plants DB, this is not found in WA


# Stem

Comment:
stem height corrected from 43.5 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 103.6


Comment:
dbh corrected based on stem taper msmt from 83.4


Comment:
ht corrected from 42.3, dbh corrected from 96.8 based on 70psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 43, dbh corrected from 106.9, based on 70 psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 49.2, dbh corrected from 130.8, based on 70 psme


Comment:
height corrected from 41 based on stem taper detailed measurement, and dbh corrected from 71.3


Comment:
ht corrected from 49.1, dbh corrected from 114.2, based on 70psme


Comment:
ht corrected from 50, dbh corrected from 154.9, based on 70psme and rite in rain


Comment:
height corrected from 47.8 to 48.8 based on yellow book, and dbh updated from 105.8 based on stem taper


Comment:
North is an estimate, ht corrected from 43.3, dbh corrected from 98.5, based on 70 psme and rite in rain


Comment:
ht corrected from 50.3, dbh corrected from 112, based on 70psme, different from stem taper b/c top ht is the ht of a reiteration


Comment:
stem height corrected from 46.5 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 90.8


Comment:
ht corrected from 52.5, dbh corrected from 126, based on 70 psme, differs from taper top height, b/c top height of stem is a reiteration


Comment:
ht corrected from 52.6, dbh corrected from 118.9, based on 70 psme, different from stem taper b/c uppermost ht is a reiteration


Comment:
stem height corrected from 36.2 to reflect detailed stem taper measurement, and dbh updated from 52.5


Comment:
ht corrected from 56.1, dbh corrected from 170.4, based on 70 psme


Comment:
dbh was updated 5/06 as it was entered as 63, but when visited on site saw that it was actually 6.3 and decimal had been ignored


