In carrying out the curriculum of
Res Publica, we are also creating a community within which we
can share our intellectual and personal understandings. This community
forms the context for conversation among us. Conversing well means
that we have to be conscious and self-reflective about how we speak
and act, how we use our time, and how we do our work individually
and collectively. That is, we cannot assume that community will happen
to us naturally; rather, we have to choose the principles by which
we will live and the activities we will support.
For us community entails sustaining disagreement, differences,
and diversity in a spirit of equality; it does not mean agreement and
uniformity. In order for us to successfully build our understandings
within our community, each one of us must agree to the following principles
and actions:
1) Respect
To create and participate in a community capable of
sustaining intense, but respectful, interaction and discourse we must:
- strive to be aware of how our actions affect others and be honest
with others about how their actions affect us;
- read and act in accordance with the Evergreen Social Contract,
the Student Conduct Code and the Sexual Harassment Policy;
- give all people opportunity and encouragement
to speak;
- maintain a reflective and respectful approach to the study of
our own and others' experiences and knowledge.
2) Engagement
To be engaged in our individual and community work
means generating and sharing personal interpretations and understandings
such that we make the material and ideas our own. Doing so requires,
at a minimum, fulfilling our responsibilities to:
- attend class and keep appointments punctually (five minutes after
the scheduled beginning of class doors will be closed and students
will have wait for a break before entering class);
- prepare assignments and evaluations promptly;
- notify the group of intended absences and schedule changes;
- attend and be actively involved in all program sessions unless
prevented by sickness or outside responsibilities.
3) Special Responsibilities of Students:
- attend all all-program events, seminars,
and workshops except when illness or other serious circumstances
prevent attendance (Student’s need to notify faculty on
the day they miss class by phone or e-mail to receive an excused
absence. Two unexplained absences are permitted each quarter.
Further unexplained or extended explained absences will result
in loss of credit.);
- do all required assignments, including maintaining
a journal, essays, workshop homework, postings, responses to peers'
drafts of essays, readings, and other occasional
tasks in full and on time; (If assignments are incomplete and/or
not turned in on the due date loss of credit may occur. To earn
full credit students must participate in discussion of complete
drafts of all their writing assignments.)
- maintain a portfolio of your work and evaluations;
- write a self-evaluation and faculty evaluation, a final transcript
evaluation, and participate in an evaluation conference each quarter;
- as is consonant with Evergreen's mediation process, take up any
grievance about a member of the teaching team with that person
first and only then, if the results are unsatisfactory, ask for
consultation with the faculty team.
- in addition to these responsibilities there will be additional
specific responsibilities developed regarding our work during the
winter/spring place study.
4) Special Responsibilities of Faculty:
- during the fifth week of each quarter notify students who as
of mid-quarter will not receive full credit for that quarter;
- give prompt and carefully considered responses to student work;
- make time available for individual conferences with students;
- handle all disputes in a spirit of respect and goodwill;
- refrain from talking with students about students' problems with
other faculty members, except with the permission of the other
faculty involved or in joint consultation with said faculty--and
then only after the students themselves have talked about the problems
with the faculty member in question;
- conduct their interactions with each other collaboratively and
professionally, and actively participate in faculty seminars and
business and planning meetings.
5) Academic Honesty
In an academic community sharing, and taking responsibility
for our own ideas is vital. At the same time, acknowledging our use
of other people's ideas is equally important. The work we submit must
reflect our own ideas. When we are incorporating the views of others,
be those published authors or our seminar mates, we must acknowledge
our sources. Since much of the work in this program will be collaborative
and the ensuing ideas will reflect the contributions of more than one
person, we must get into the habit of acknowledging the people and
ideas that have influenced us. There will be many times when we will
be asked to take individual positions--in essays, research projects,
and seminar discussions--and we must assert our own distinctive interpretations
and judgments. The final work we do must reflect our own judgment and
analysis while also recognizing the contributions of people who have
influenced our learning.
Failure to make such acknowledgments or to present the work of others as our
own is plagiarism. Any student who plagiarizes material will be asked to leave
the program and may be required to leave the college. Because college policy
makes the consequences of plagiarism so severe, ask your faculty members if
you have any questions.
6) Resolving Conflicts
Academic and personal conflicts are common and to be
expected in academic communities. The Social Contract lays out expectations
about how we all should deal with such conflicts:
Evergreen can thrive only
if members respect the rights of others while enjoying their
own rights. … All
[members of the community] must share alike in prizing academic
and interpersonal honesty, in responsibly obtaining and in providing
full and accurate information, and in resolving their differences
through due process and with a strong will to collaboration. (The
Social Contract--WAC 174-120-020)
We expect all members of the program to abide by these
principles of honest and face-to-face resolution of conflicts. In the
event you do not feel successful in resolving a conflict, bring your
concerns to the attention of your seminar leader or to the faculty
team. Any conflicts that cannot be resolved by your own efforts, those
of your seminar leader, or the faculty team, will be referred to our
program dean or other mutually agreed upon mediator.
Any disputes about credit or the content of an evaluation must first be addressed
to the faculty member who wrote the evaluation. If a student is not satisfied
by a discussion with the faculty member involved; the issue will be brought
before the faculty team. The program faculty will make final decisions about
credit and evaluations.
7) Credit Policy
Faculty will award each student 16 credits per quarter
for doing college-level work (or 12, if that option has been exercised),
for attendance and punctuality at all program events, and for completing
all assignments on time. Faculty may award less than sixteen (or twelve)
credits for work which fails to meet these criteria, but they will
do so only after consultation with each other.
After you have read these pages, please
sign and detach this note to indicate your agreement with the covenant. Pass
this along to your seminar leader.
Signed:
Date:
|