Things to Think About

From digmovements

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Activism Online

  • community
  • collective identity
  • democratic space
  • political action

[edit] Features of An Online Project

  • good
    • speed
    • reach
    • large numbers
    • can create sophisticated discourse
  • bad
    • problems with fact checking, verification
    • new notions of credibility, vetting
    • resilience of traditional power structures
    • can create drek

[edit] Early Text Based Outreach

  • technologies
    • email
    • usenet grups
    • discussion lists
    • FTP sites
  • document types
    • protest letters
    • online petitions
  • strategies
    • subvert corporate hierarchies, email the CEO
    • recirculate, create form letters

[edit] Hacktivism

  • trolling
  • lurking
  • spin
  • crashing servers and virtual sit-ins
  • parody and decoy sites
  • vandalism and criminal mischief

[edit] Online Alliances

  • good
    • cross pollination of ideas
    • builds activist networks
    • increases reach
  • limits
    • can dilute purpose, confuse cause
    • uneven funding
    • uneven commitment
    • uneven or competing leaderships

[edit] Tilly's Cautionary Thoughts on Social Movements and the Web

  • irony of anti-globalization movements going global using globalizing technologies
  • can increase problems of coordination and control in established, RL movements
  • can dilute commitment by making it easy to click and be done
  • can bifurcate movements into global and local activists, disrupting national and regional alliances
    • tech savvy and rich vs tech excluded and poor
    • local leaderships can get distracted and/or recruited into web work and away from local concerns

[edit] Typologies of Web Activism

  • web based born digital
  • web enhanced already existing
  • awareness/outreach - education and information
  • organization/mobilization - calls for offline or RL action
  • action/reaction - hacktivism and online civil disobedience

[edit] Consuming vs Using Activist Websites

  • surfing and clicking smotth activist sites can dumb you down
    • outreach sites condition netizens to be passive readers dependent on experts
    • merchandising and online fundraising conflates activism and consumerism
    • clicking on petitions and forwarding form emails is too easy and not enough
  • best way to avoid this
    • inform yourself at sites with social media options and use them
  • two-way communication, collaboration of experts and readers, creates reform community ownership of knowledge

[edit] Week Seven Scorecard for Online Activism

  • What the web is enough for:
    • organize events
    • build coalitions between groups
    • viral information delivery for RL events - reach and speed
    • spark interest and outrage
  • What the web is not enough for:
    • f2f local activism
    • virtual events and chats suck
    • online content still inaccessible to lots of people
    • remaining current requires motivation
    • irritating smart asses are made more irritating and smart ass
  • Web is US-centric
    • other cultures find American pop culture morally offensive
    • intrusive and colonizing
    • the way images and media are read differs in a Walter Ong way, especially in areas recently electrified
  • Social media applications are dumbing down a new generation of users
    • don't have to learn the liberal arts of web dev
    • social media can give a false sense of engaged usership
    • Myspace, Facebook, etc, mostly narcissistic and unhelpful for serious reform causes

[edit] Memorable Quotes from Seminar

  • "Facebook is the Walmart of identity."
  • "User friendly or user stupid."
  • "Does God have a Myspace page?"
  • "You are what you link."
  • "The internet IS amazing unless you don't have it."

[edit] Online Insurgency

  • in the absence of civil rights, the web can serve
    • media relay
    • global witnessing
    • networking
    • reconceive community, either de-territorize or re-territorialize it
  • disparate web content can create narrative when taken together
    • US media coverage on the web inadvertently portrayed Iraq as victim of US aggression
    • links do more than link; they define sympathies and ideologies
  • information becomes a commodity when a market of interest in created
    • distance lobbying by those with civil rights for those without
    • fundraising
  • recipe for successful insurgent websites
    • media rich sites are more successful
    • multilingual content
      • local language for target reform audience
      • western languages for outreach and solitication of support
    • use an aesthetic of transgression to attract big media interest
  • concept of deceptive scaling
    • small groups can loom large with savvy, media rich sites
    • the world can seem a city, a local town on fire the whole world
    • small groups can confabulate their influence, legitmacy, and activities
  • the oxymoron of assymetric warfare
  • the American phantasmagoric reading of Al Qaeda online

[edit] More Lessons on Online Insurgency

  • non state actors can penetrate global consciousness
    • piggy back onto big media
  • web content can augment and escalate change
  • rebels fighting for national territory use transnational, nonspatial communication tools
  • "global mediascape"
  • the web employs all past communications technologies - text, photography, video
    • cultural differences mediate their effects

[edit] Week Nine Scorecard

  • Web 2.0 expands access to web publishing, but it feeds conformity.
  • who you link to, and who links to you, reflects on you
  • web encourages personal narcissism/isolation and acute global consciousness at the same time
    • web can polarize individual consciousness, push it to extremes that each encourages passivity
  • the web is different from things before it in number only
    • but also in kind, as existing strategies are adapted, and ultimately, transformed by it

[edit] I've Learned Something Today

  • the web is not a panacea
  • the internet and the web are two different things
  • the web is not a "place"
    • it is also not a commons-without-scarcity