2003-2004 EVALUATION conferences, Prof. E.J. Zita, Lab II Rm 2272

These are 15-minute meetings.  Please arrive 5 minutes early so we can start promptly.  (After each 15 min. meeting, your prof needs 15 minutes to edit evaluatations based on our conversation.) 
One week in advance:  Turn in your complete portfolio, draft self-eval, and peer evals (see Portfolio & Eval guidelines for details).  This includes completed record sheets for Physics of Astronomy and Seminar
Bring to your conference: your revised self-eval,  and put your faculty eval  in the envelope mounted outside the secretaries' door (Lab II Rm 2250).
Get at your conference:  eval from faculty, any recent assignments, and your portfolio.  Those are yours to keep.  See sample evals at the bottom of this page.

SPRING	These are 15-minute meetings. Come on time! Zita will use the 15 minutes after each meeting to finish each eval.
FRIDAY	MONDAY	TUESDAY	WEDNESDAY
	12:00 Carlos Aviles	12:00 N. Streuli	11:00 T. Schmidt
			11:30 Chris Dove
			12:00 Chris + Night
	12:30 A. Brown,	12:30 Doug Jenkins,	12:30 NS
10-12: meetings	1:00 Brian Flewell,	1:00 Bryan Fordney,	1:00 Gene Schultz
	1:30 Chris Seel,	1:30 Jais Brohinsky,	1:30 BREAK
2:30 Ryan Smith, rsmith@riseup.net	2:00 John Samson,	2:00 V. Postil,	2:00 Annie Lehman annjl25@hotmail.com
3:00 J. Maxwell, 867-0051	2:30 Jake Sarrantonio,	2:30 H. Tramel	2:30 J. Walsh  veritasapril@eudoramail.com
3:30 E. Lien, 570-0534	3:00 BREAK	3:00 BREAK	3:00 E. Ogden ogderi08
	3:30 Joey Fedrow,, fedjos28	3:30 Ed Janicki,	3:30 Nick Rosenbladt rosnic25
	4:00 Brian Orr, orrbri27	4:00 L. Porter,	4:00 B. Gagne gagbre14
otakuba@msn.com	4:30 Jon Germano,	4:30 C. Meza,
funfun@aol.com	5:00 Patrick Atrz,	5:00 S. Murphy,
	5:30 Kalling Heck,	5:30 Don Noe

 

.	WINTER	.
Friday 12 March 2004		Monday 15 March 2004
Jared Dubey	9:30-9:45	C. Bunn
Neil Huizenga	10:00 - 10:15	Sean Muir
Daniel Laggner	10:30 - 10:45	M. Perkins
Dorian	11:00 - 11:15	A. Lehman
meetings	11:30 -11:45	Kellen Lavin
meetings	12:00 - 1:00	lunch
Tyler Baumgartner	1:00 - 1:15	Tristen Bristow
M. Davis	1:30 - 1:45	Matt Lampe
K. Foster	2:00 - 2:15	E. Ogden 786-1801 erinogden@comcast.net
G. Schultz	2:30 -2:45	J. Walsh  970-1694
break	3:00 - 3:30	break
Andrew White 253-884-4847	3:30 - 3:45	Joey Fedrow (phone?)
Chris Dove	4:00 - 4:15	Brian Orr (phone?)
Night Song	4:30 - 4:45	S. Mealy
C. Thomas-A	5:00 - 5:15	Jake Holt (phone?)

 

Sample evaluations: DRAFT

Aa did (excellent, very good, good, fair, passing) work in (most of, much of) this program and learned a (great deal, fair amount) . SHe participated (actively) in (all, most, some) classes. SHe was (always, usually, sometimes, occasionally) well prepared and contributed (quite, somewhat) effectively. SHe completed (all, most, some) assignments with (excellent, very good, good, fair, passing) quality. Aa's seminar essays improved in clarity, coherence, and depth. For example, in __, Aa wrote: SHe showed (excellent, very good, good, some) ability to synthesize ideas from diverse sources, and to appreciate depth and nuance in meaning. SHe (is learning to) appropriately reference texts, in discussions and in writing. Aa was a (reliable and effective, teammate, always meeting commitments and contributing significantly to joint assignments. Classmates report that Aa: Aa's best learning was in __. SHe developed strong skills in __ and demonstrated significant growth in __. For example, ___. SHe can benefit from greater attention to __. His/Her teams prepared clear handouts for their science minilectures, asked good questions, and helped the class learn to solve new problems. Aa contributed __ to class dynamics. Overall, Aa was a very valuable participant in this program and is well prepared for more advanced work.

Cc could have learned and contributed more effectively by always completing assignments and attending regularly.