May
27:
Everyone's project hard-copy
is due at 10am. Some will present their project work; everyone is required
to attend. A weekly essay is not required, but
submitting one if you've missed others would be a good idea. Your self
evaluation draft is due, in hard-copy. Please leave your project manuscript
and self-evaluation in the box by my office door. The box will be brought
to me at 4 pm.
May 23-24:
Read Sellars' "Philosophy and the Scientific Image
of Man " and
be prepared for seminar discussion.
May 20:
Some will present their project work; everyone is required to attend.
May 17:
Read pp. 1-18 of Sellars' "Philosophy and the Scientific Image
of Man," in case there is time to begin discussion of this longer essay
before next week.
May 16-17:
Read Sellars' "Being and Being Known" and be prepared
for seminar discussion.
May 9-10:
Read Quine's "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" and be prepared for seminar
discussion.
May 2-3:
Read Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and
be prepared for seminar discussion. In addition, read at least one
encylopedia article on Wittgenstein's "earlier" work.
April 29:
Write and post some part of your project, something from somewhere
in the middle, and something in which you work closely with a text. Bring
copies of what you write for each membe of your pod and one for Chuck.
Below this posting (in the same discussion site),
post your revized outline and highlight where the written piece fits.
Please
post the texts rather than links to files.
April 26:
Read Moore's "A Defense of Common Sense" and be prepared
for seminar discussion.
April
25:
Read Moore's "Proof
of an External World" and be
prepared for seminar discussion.
Reread
Kant's preface to the second edition
of The Critique...
April 22:
In our project workshop,
we’re going to work on the rhetoric of your
project essay, the design you use to move your audience from “common
ground” to “your ground.”
An effective argument begins with premises
that not only are true but also are statements that your intended
audience accepts without much doubt or controversy (at least not
initially). So an important
part of your design is choosing where to begin. Often this takes
the form of motivating your leading question or questions. [Consider
Descartes's Meditations… in this light.]
Of course you can arrive at a design only if
you know where you are going. Once you have the end point [”your ground”]
and the starting point [“common ground”] clearly identified,
you can work out the path you’re going to take. This will
be your argument.
So, for Friday write up the following:
1. A clear
statement of where your project will end up, of your central conclusion
or conclusions.
2.What you assume about
your audience (the audience you choose to
write to): what are the important beliefs and values you assume you
share with this audience? [Your audience might be your pod-mates,
or the PLR group, or some other group (not me, however)…]
3. A
clear statement of where you are going to begin: what you will “stake
out” as the “common ground” on which you and your
reader will initially meet.
4. A complete sentence outline that shows
the path you will take in leading your reader from where you begin
to your destination.
Bring copies of all this to class on
Friday for your pod members and for Chuck.
Weekly essays are due by 10am: everyone posts, and
Group A hands in hard copy.
April 18-19:
Reread the previous assignment and the "Transcendal Logic - Introduction" (pp.
105-117), and pp. 129-150, pp. 175-203.
April 15:
By 10am, at the latest, post your project prospectus in the
web-x discussion site found inside the folder for your "pod." Write
an introduction to your project of at least 300 words, presenting your
topic, questions, most important philosophical texts you will work
with, bibliography you have found... Your aim is to convince others
in your pod that you've gotten hold of something interesting, something
they would like to know more about.
Bring six copies of your introduction to our 10am workshop - we will
work on it and rewrite as necessary. Then post your introduction in
the appropriate site by Friday evening.
Weekly essays are due by 10am: everyone posts, and
Group B hands in hard copy.
April
12:
Read
Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, "Translator's
Preface" (pp. xvii-xxiii), the "Introduction" by Patricia
Kitcher (pp. xxv-lix), the "Preface" to the second edition
(pp. 15-40), the "Introduction"
to the second edition (43-75) and all of the "Transcendal Aesthtic" (pp.
71-74). Use only the Pluhar edition and bring your copy to class.
April
11:
Read Hume, An Enquiry Concerning
Human Understanding, "Sections
9-12" (pp. 165-211 in the Oxford edition) and be prepared for
seminar discussion beginning on Monday morning.
Beauchamp's introduction to the
Oxford edition (pp. 7-61) of the Enquiry... is well
worth reading.
April 8:
We will organize project work into small groups, discuss and
refine proposals, and write up the proposals so that they can be posted
by Monday morning.
April 4-5:
Read Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, "Sections 1-8" (pp.
87-164 in the Oxford edition) and be prepared for seminar discussion
beginning on Monday afternoon.
Monday we will continue our
discussion of Descartes' Meditations...
April 1:
Bring both a hardcopy and a file copy of your first weekly essay (see
Weekly writing - details). You can put
the file copy in the Scratch folder of Calawa or bring the file on
disc. At 11:30, we will go over to the GCC classroom (Library 4th floor),
for an intro to Web-x. You will post your essay during that workshop.
Reread Meditations V and VI and read Parts V-VI of "Discourse
on the Method..."
March 29:
Read "Meditations I - IV" carefully for the morning and afternoon seminars.
Read "Meditations V and VI" quickly, so you know where Descartes is
headed.
Read Parts II-IV of "Discourse on the Method..."
March 28:
Read Descartes's letter "to the most wise and illustrious...", his "Preface
to the reader," and his "Synopsis of the six following meditations." Also
read "Meditation I."
Read Part I of "Discourse on the Method..." We will not focus on this
work primarily in seminar, but read it for background and further understanding
of what Descartes is up to.