The Language of Politics

This was on Cnn's website in a recap of the Republican debates this week. I remember my high school history teacher preaching the gospel of Regan. I found this really funny but also disturbing.

Can’t see the words for the forest.

Last night I was listening for comments about what was happening in the language of the selections, but everything said seemed to be focusing on the specifics of the names and the issues involved. What proceeded from that was a discussion and judgment of the rightness or wrongness of the issues or the trashing of the people involved based on what was brought to class already in our minds. I wanted to pop up and suggest that we change the names of the principals in the selections so that we could see more clearly what was happening with the language, but it wasn’t my role. So, I changed the names involved and wrote a little blurb in the spirit of the two platforms:

Hello fellow students in the Politics of Language. Declare your candidacy as a Student Government Representative today! The cutoff date is Monday, May 7, so hurry and make a run for office! Forms are available from me or from www2.evergreen.edu/studentgovernment or at CAB 320 Student Activities Space Number 11 at The Geoduck Union.

Asenka Miller, Student Government Representative 2006-2007 

I am going to school for art so I've been trying to think of a related issue. Does anyone have any ideas?

I found this episode of To The Point very interesting. I especially found the information from the doctor to be pertinent to the naming issue. Listen to it here.

Supreme Court Moves the Anatomical Landmark

The Supreme Court last week upheld the first restriction of any kind on abortion since Roe v. Wade legalized abortion for any reason in all fifty states during all nine months of pregnancy in January, 1973. Previous to that date each state was free to choose its own abortion laws. Just months before Roe, voters in Washington State installed by referendum the most extreme abortion law in the country. Mostly the abortion procedure was restricted to certain specific circumstances in the vast expanse of North America, but a few states like Washington, California and New York had very liberal abortion laws in 1973.

Hello, everybody. Nice to have people writing back about my blog entry regarding PP driving deep into genocide. This post is a response to them and I am putting it on the blog forum because the great computer just makes one long hard-to-read paragraph in the ‘response to response’ mode:

The bramble fields of our brains…

I wasn't trying to demonize Margaret Sanger or PP. I am more of an observer rather than a participant out there trying to change the world or rule it. Philosophical anarchists are like that. They tend to anger the true believers and activists. I like freedom and it is about the only thing that I insist on. William James said that genius is 'simply that quality of viewing the world in non-habitual ways.' That leaves room for all of us to break out of the slogans, clichés or metaphors that are like the familiar rabbit trails (‘circuits’ to the Linguistic Darwinists) that lace the bramble fields of our brains. To have a different thought than the habitual, a person has to blaze a new path thru the thicket. The activists, true-believers and ideologues discourage this, consider such thinking as thought-crime, and try to kill it before it spreads by varying techniques that include bullying. This is all observable in the real world. In my opinion, the ideologues feel threatened by non-habitual thinking because mostly they are trying to create their utopian dream and new-thought is dangerous to their plans. How can their utopia be created when people are going off on thought tangents? All they want is some agreement on their view of the world, history, all of existence and the way things should be. Is that too much to ask? Non-conformity is dangerous to them. Communism is a form a utopianism, but it created the two most prolific mass murderers in the history of the world—Stalin and Mao—yet, some true-believers still want to give Communism a proper chance to work. What does it take to discredit a philosophy? The problem with any utopia is that one needs a state to enforce it or bring it about.

You Are What You Grow

Brian Ulrich

 

Planned Parenthood drives deep into genocide

by positioning its clinics in minority districts

Margaret Sanger (1879-1966) was a pioneer in the birth control movement and a founder of groups that would become our modern Planned Parenthood. Life Magazine has ranked Sanger as one of the most important persons of this century. She suffered for her beliefs and activities promoting knowledge of birth control methods which were considered obscene and which were thought to promote promiscuity. Her view that suffering was associated with large families persisted throughout her life and was reinforced when she worked as a nurse in her early years. 'I remember that ever since I was a child, the idea of large families associated itself with poverty in my mind.' She saw motherhood as at its core degrading to the female when women were forced by circumstances and lack of knowledge to continue to bear children into a life a misery and squalor. 'Can children carried through nine months of dread and unspeakable mental anguish and born into an atmosphere of fear and anger, to grow up uneducated and in want, be a benefit to the world?' she asked in The New Motherhood. She didn't like large families as a general proposition: 'Large families among the rich are immoral...they invade the natural right of woman to the control of her own body, to self-development and to self-expression...'