Drupal annex |
Spring Satellites |
syllabus |
schedule |
assignments |
books |
program organization |
program convenant |
contacts |
program catalog description |
The Evergreen State College
Last Updated:
03/29/2008
Week 1 Assigment for this satellite: Read the Preface and Introduction to Kant's Critique of Judgment, using this on-line edition |
Kathleen Eamon
Knowing Me, Knowing Symbols
Over the course of these ten weeks, I will be finishing my dissertation. This is an invitation to participate in discussions organized almost entirely around that work, which means you’ll be witness to the dirty work that goes into a philosophy dissertation, and I’ll be able to complete said dirty work in the context of a community and with the help of serious collaborative reading and discussion. My biggest hope is that my enthusiasm for my work with students here will enliven my scholarly work, and my enthusiasm for that scholarly work will enliven our work in common.
My dissertation is basically about our strange and
strangely collective capacity to be "interested" in objects or representations that don't seem
to hold out any promise of satisfaction, gratification, or use, and to be "repelled" by
objects that don't seem to hold out any threat of harm. In this way, it is
about us at our most unnatural. I class as “symbolic” all objects
and representations to which we are thus oriented, although the task of classifying
won’t be my primary one. The aim of the dissertation is to understand
something about what I call “symbolic rationality”: symbol formation,
expression, and recognition, as well as the social and political implications,
uses, and abuses of these processes. Kant’s work on our orientation to
works of art will serve as a paradigm for symbolic rationality, but we’ll
cast our net widely, thinking about religion, politics, popular culture, even
hobbies and neuroses.
The investigation moves forward with the help of a series of texts, which
include: Kant’s Critique of Judgment, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Marx’s
Capital, German Ideology, and the 18th Brumaire, finishing with Freud. As a
way of making some amends for ignoring “reality” for so long, the
final chapter will deploy its hard-won definition of symbolic rationality in
an attempt to better understand the contemporary contests over marriage. This
will allow us (hopefully) to make clearer some of the connections that will
have emerged between this symbolic orientation to objects and representations
and our ethical and political orientation to other human beings.
Since this is a fairly unconventional undertaking, we will have to work out some of the details as we move forward. I will provide, a week in advance, a substantial piece of writing for seminar discussion. In addition, we’ll read selections from the works cited in the dissertation. I will be relying on the students to help me find the best balance between my secondary work and the primary texts.