Drupal annex |
Spring Satellites |
syllabus |
schedule |
assignments |
books |
program organization |
program convenant |
contacts |
program catalog description |
The Evergreen State College
Last Updated:
03/29/2008
Program Covenant (Covenant in .pdf format, for downloading and printing)
In carrying out the curriculum of Knowing Nature, we are creating a community in which we can share our intellectual and personal understandings. This community forms the context for our conversations together. Conversing well requires being conscious and reflective about how we speak and act, how we use our time, and how we do our work individually and collectively. We cannot assume that a community will come about naturally. We must choose principles and activities that will enable us to build a community, one that becomes a community of learners. Such a community requires sustaining disagreement, differences, and diversity in a spirit of equality. In order to achieve this, each of us must agree to the following principles and actions: To create and participate in a community capable of sustaining intense, but respectful, interaction and discourse we must:
To be engaged in our individual and community work means generating and sharing personal interpretations and understandings such that we make the material and ideas our own. Doing so requires, at a minimum, fulfilling our responsibilities to:
3) Special Responsibilities of Students:
4) Special Responsibilities of Faculty:
In an academic community, sharing and taking responsibility
for our own ideas is vital. At the same time, acknowledging use
of other people's ideas is equally important. Often our work
will be collaborative, so we must get into the habit of acknowledging
the people and ideas that have influenced us. At other times, we will
be asked to take individual positions -- in essays, research projects,
and seminar discussions--and assert our own distinctive interpretations
and judgments. In the end, we must take responsibility for our own
work while also recognizing
the contributions of those who have influenced our learning. Academic and personal conflicts arise in academic communities. The Social Contract lays out expectations about how we should deal with such conflicts:
We expect everyone in Knowing Nature to abide by these
principles of honest and face-to-face resolution of conflicts. In the
event you have not been able to resolve a conflict, bring your
concerns to the attention of your seminar leader or to the faculty
team (or Therese Saliba, if necessary). Any conflicts that cannot be
resolved by your own efforts, those of your seminar leader, or the
faculty team, or Therese, will be referred to our program dean or other
mutually agreed upon mediator.
Of course, college credit depends on college-level work. Faculty take for granted that this implies attendance and punctuality at all program events and timely completion of all assignments. Faculty will assess the quality of student work along the way. Determination of whether or not student work is credit worthy will be made when a student completes (or exits) the program. Credit is a matter of what a student achieves, not where a student began. In determining credit, faculty will assess both the quality of student work throughout the program and what a student subsequently accomplishes. Since Knowing Nature is a coherent, interdisciplinary curriculum, there is no guarantee that partial work will result in partial credit.
|