The Joy Luck Club

I watched this movie in my 10th grade U.S. History class before, so this is the second time I have watched it. I understand it a little more then I did the first time because I now have more knowledge on Asian-American History.

“They hoped to be lucky, that hope was their only joy.”

Connection: Anybody notice that the song that the little girl sang at the talent show was the same song was the same song that was in the movie “Slaying the Dragon”? Also they brought up the movie “The world of Suzie Wong” which was also talked about in the movie “Slaying the Dragon.”

All of the men in the movie were douche bags! They were all jerks to their wives and didn’t treat them right !

Saving Face & Joy Luck Club

saving_faceSaving Face: I had to think about what kind of crisis the charters have in this movie and really it wasn’t that had to find one. Will is struggling to tell her mother that she is a lesbian. She can’t come out to her own mother because she is afraid of how she is going to react. Even though her mother got disowned by her father because she got pregnant and wasn’t married. It was kind of funny to see how the mother would disown her own daughter when she knows how sad and hard it is to be disowned by her father. How can the mother disown her daughter when she is trying to be happy, the same reason why the mother got disowned by her father?  Lucky, by the end of the movie the mother was able to see that the Will wanted the same thing that she did, to be happy and to be able to love.

Joy_luck_club_movie_castThe Joy Luck Club: Well in this movie you  didn’t even have to pay attention to find the crisis. There were so many bad things that happened in this movie. I almost cried about four to five times while watching. From each character the stories just got more and more powerful. When you thought that something bad happened another bad thing happened that topped the last. I really enjoyed this movie because we didn’t see the typical love story. We see mothers and daughters coming together, finding that their lives aren’t as great as one expected.

Questions of Authenticity in East Main Street

Notions of authenticity are a running theme in the chapters I’ve read so far in East Main Street. In this post, I’ll be looking at authenticity in the three chapters for this week’s reading.
What does it mean to be Asian or Asian American? Where do the borders between race, ethnicity and nationality lie? Who is “authentically” Asian, and what right do they have to engage with Asian cultures outside of their ethnicity/nationality?

In the chapter “Model Minorities Can Cook”, Anita Mannur focuses on dissecting Asian fusion cuisine. She uses two celebrity chefs as focal points for her argument, Padma Lakshmi and Ming Tsai. Questions of authenticity arise when looking at the way that both chefs present (and subsequently commodify) a wide range of Asian cooking styles outside of their respective cultures or training. They claim all of Asian cuisine as their own, with no regard for establishing a pan-Asian culture, instead, ”Asianness, as it filters into their respective culinary styles, emerges as something that they instinctively understand because they are Asian American” (85).

In ” ‘Alllooksame’? Mediating Asian American Visual Cultures of Race on the Web” the website alllooksame.com  is put under scrutiny. The website has a series of quizzes to test the user in identifying Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans. Lisa Nakamura purposes that alllooksame challenges notions of authenticity by putting the user in the role of racial profiler. Who is Japanese? Who is Korean? The inevitable failure of the user in correctly categorizing “Asian” faces leads to the questioning and eventual discarding of essentializing notions of race. Alllooksame.com disconnects race from the realm of the visual, and reveals the role of the user in participating in the construction of race, “By calling into question what “Asian” is, at least in visual terms, Suematsue is interrogating the basis upon which racial taxonomies like ‘asian’ are built” (267).

Like Nakamura, Shilpa Dave locates race outsides of the body in “Apu’s Brown Voice”. Dave interrogates the role of accents in relation to power and cultural citizenship. Using the character of Apu from The Simpsons, Dave introduces the concept of “brown voice” to describe the particular Indian English accent that is mimicked by a white voice actor for the character of Apu. Brown voice homogenizes South Asian immigrant cultures, and because of the history of British colonialism, it aligns itself more closely with whiteness than with Asian American identity. Dave questions the authenticity of accent in performing Indianness. By performing brown voice, the user gains control over how they are going to be culturally received because of the accents association with class privilege. Examining the legacy of “mimicry” and the creation of the colonial subject, one is lead to question notions of authenticity in regards to voice and accent.

Slaying The Dragon and The Slanted Screen

Julie Chen is an Chinese American television host on The Talk. She recently talked about how she got plastic surgery to make her eyes larger to look “more American.” Her bosses would tell her that she looked as if she were bored because her eyes were slanted. It was interesting to compare the difference in what Slaying The Dragon said about how producers wanted Asian actresses to look more exotic and how the lady that got the CNN job had to have her makeup a curtain way to make her look more Asian. With this being said I think its really sad that we can lose ourselves by what the media wants us to be.

Season-2-Cast-Photo-Shoot-the-oc-5221402-1500-1125The O.C T.V show has always been one of my favorites. When Slanted Screen talked about the O.C they told the viewers that The O.C didn’t have any minorities and when they tried to incorporate more minorities the writers rewrote it.  I have watched the O.C over and over again and never saw any person of color unless they were showing  people in Chino where it was supposed to be a poor poverty area which, would then show Latinos. After watching a show but not really seeing the problems it becomes more real to me how main stream television portrays people of color. We still have very few main stream actors in television that are people of color.

We hardly see movies that have interracial couples that aren’t Asian and White, or Black and White, or Latino and White if they are even showed at all.  In Slanted Screen the film reminded us about Romeo Must Die and how main stream media doesn’t want to see an African American women with an Asian man. Although many people root for romantic endings many wouldn’t want to see Aaliyah and Jet Lee together. Although Romeo Must Die was supposed to me the new version of Romeo and Juliet.

Also with Asian men with their love interest in movies its crazy to see how many movies have Asian men get with a American women. I saw how in Rush Hour, Lee played by Jackie Chan never had a love interest even if Chris Tucker had many love interest in all three movies.

Orientalism in Joy Luck Club

In Slaying The Dragon the history of Asian American women in American cinema is presented. There are several prominent stereotypes of Asian women: the dragon lady, Suzy Wong, and the “China doll”. For the purposes of this post, I’d like to examine what I’m calling the “China doll” stereotype, which positions Asian women as being exotic, deferential, and submissive. Quiet and subservient, Asian American women are seen as catering to and pampering their husbands.

As a viewer, I enjoyed some elements of Joy Luck Club, I also realized how it was pandering to Western audiences and relying on stereotypes of Asian women. The film centers on mother-daughter relationships, bringing generational trauma to the forefront. Using flashbacks, the film showcases the four mother’s traumatic childhoods in China. At some point in the childhood narrative, each mother is presented as a “China doll”, submissive, and helpless. China is seen through an Orientalist lens, exotic, inscrutable, mists, and mountains. The traumatic experiences that the four mothers face at the hands of Chinese men, and the atrocities they commit for survival are presented through the misty haze of Orientalism. The West and China stand in dire contrast to each other. China is patriarchal, hierarchal, a site of sorrow and loss. The West is the place of new beginnings, of middle class lifestyle, and “hope”.

The mothers themselves are Others, representative of the East. While their daughters represent the West. Each narrative involves a cultural clash between mother and daughter. In Orientals, Lee talks talks at length about the Victorian domestic sphere, a concept that I found to be particularly intriguing. A central theme of Joy Luck Club is divorce, and marriage. All of the women go to great lengths to accommodate their husbands and maintain their domestic households, even to the detriment of their own needs. It’s interesting to note that the film presents the disruptions in the daughter’s domestic lives as being caused by their internalized generational trauma passed down from their mothers, instead of relating it to gender or sexism within marriage as an institution. For example, Rose gives up her chance to study aboard and becomes completely deferential to her husband’s needs. Yet, her submissiveness attributed to her Chinese heritage, rather than the structure of the marriage itself.

Joy Luck Club has interesting things to say about generational trauma, and is one of the only well-known Hollywood movies that centers around Asian American women. I actually did enjoy this film, at the same time, it relies on Orientalism and stereotypes to get across its message.

Dave: thoughts, questions, ect.

East main StreetFor East Main Street…I choose chapters 6,10, and 14 to bring up some discussion topics, questions ect.

Chapter 6-  pg.118 What’s your opinion on those provocative phrases…please explain? Are they eye catching/why? Are they appropriate or inappropriate…both/why? Do you think that those kind of phrases and/or titles are necessary to be “eye catching”/why?

- pg.129 Dave talks about Asians being recruited as “cheap labor” and being “unassimilable”…What are some examples you can give that support  and deny that?

- pg. 130 What’s your opinion on on how Dave talks about how “queerness” is acquired?

Side note…I googled the definition of “queer” and the definition makes me sick!

Chapter 10- pg. 206 Dave talks about Japanese American Women having to compete with white standards…UGH I just don’t even like that whole topic of “white or caucasian” beauty. Who even said what was what and did people go with that?

-Opinions and thoughts on what Dave talks about assimilation and beauty [207]…They are either too Japanese or not enough. So they create pageants to build confidence and self esteem, however it’s seen as the Japanese distancing themselves further from “American or white culture” so they are not assimilating..and if they were, white society still saw them as an other.

-pg. 211 Why do you think there was such an “outcry” from the Japanese Community even though the pageants were considered “outdated and sexist”/why?

Chapter 14- pg. 273 have you ever had that feeling that Dave describes knowing the race of the actor in the movie? How you have “outed” or “spotted” that persons racial background? If so, why?

-pg. 274 Why do you think Keanu Reeves is an iconic figure? Why do you think people talk about his sexuality and his racial background? Is it controversial or just interesting? Thoughts and explanations.

-pg.276 Race by Association…I found that topic really interesting because people do that everyday! People try to automatically assume they know what somebodies racial background is by just simply “the way they look”..That’s really irritating. What are your opinions and thoughts on people asking others what their racial background is? Acceptable or not/why?

 

 

Friday 01/31

I’d like to start off by saying that some of these chapters were harder of me to comprehend as the writing was a little weird or even just me having no previous knowledge of some of the things I will bring up and try to attend to. Within the reading for Friday we discussed the overall knowledges through the Jigsaw related chapters from Lee.

“They like you because you’re a potato queen

They like you because you’re one hell of a gardener.

They like you because you work three full-time jobs–scraping

greasy floors, scouring pots and pans, and scrubbing toilet bowls.

They like you because you’re a walking cholera, hepatitis, and TB.

They like you because your a minimum-wage.

They like you because you have maids back home.

They like you because you’re a doctor there and a nurses aid here.

They like you because you say you have a college degree but they say its only the equivalent of a ninth grade American Education. ” pg 126

What does this make you think or how does it make you feel, this poem is regarding  ideas for “the queering of cheap labor and the cheapening of Queen labor” Why should these individuals be degraded, or looked at differently because the jobs they choose, life they choose or beliefs their adopt. I look at it as unfair and disrespectful where its hard for me to truly comprehend that some of these thinkings are truly ways that people among us think and thats where some of my personal in-maturities take true affect on how I look at our world, at least for today. Chapter 10 than goes on to discuss Nisei week, Miss Cherry Blossom (Sakura) and how that meets the mainstream ideas of Miss America. Within the chapter it discusses Nisei week, Miss cherry blossom, the positives and negatives and the role that was portrayed as who’s ‘American’. At this time a lot of images were seen as blonde hair blues eyes and skinny as being the ultimate ‘American girl’ and these were the girls that were voted into the pageants where as now with the change of our country we have become a mixing pot of cultures that is more open to multiracial marriage, children etc. Also allowing the acceptance of all woman of different background to participate in Miss America as well as repressing America overall. Thats an extreme accomplishment considering during this time of age Nisei week and miss cherry blossom had to have their own sub pageant to win overall. To go onto Chapter 11 more related around Tiger woods, this chapter analyzes in depth the image Tiger Woods has allowed himself identify as “Cablinasian” which is black, white, asian and native. As someone who is playing in a sport that is predominately white, older rich men he sort of takes away that stereotypes and starts a new image sort of making history. “The Tiger Woods iconography shuttles seamlessly between race consciousness and racial elision.” pg 223 Within these chapters it discusses and allows us to see the many things that we have overcome since our country has received more and more immigrants predominately focused on Asian Americans but think of all the races combined and the mixing pot we’ve formed allowing individuals work together, become accepting of all sorts of scenarios within races and truly making history with indidvuals changes laws, changing the stereotype and overall image looked at by an audience and taking the lists of things our country has overcome to a new high.

 

 

Slaying the Dragon Connections

From watching the documentary entitled “Slaying the Dragon” and the assigned readings of Lee I noticed some connection between the information conveyed in the film and the book. One of these connections can be seen in the way in which these racial stereotypes and images of Asian Americans are spread throughout the population. In Lee’s book we see that these images and stereotypes of the Chinese immigrants in the 19th century were spread through songs, and minstrel shows. However in a more high tech fashion shown in the film Slaying the Dragon we see the spread of Asian American’s and Asian American Women stereotypes being distributed through films and media.

Some of the stereotypes that are displayed in Lee’s book and in the film is this idea of Asian American woman’s exotic nature making them out to be these sexual beings. This can be seen in the movie characters Linda Low in the film “Flower Drum Song” and Hana Ogi in the film “Sayonara.” As Lee states in reference to these characters, “… Hana Ogi, Linda Low are the personification of sexual fantasy…”(176) This idea of Asian females being exotic sexual beings, are displayed throughout films as well as in Lee’s book, and without a doubt has left an impression of Asian American females on American society.

We also see this idea in films of Asian women becoming these, “model wifes” who wait hand and foot on their husbands every need. This idea of the Asian female being the perfect figure to assimilate into American culture and to be domesticated and, ” transformed from exotics into American girls suitable for marriage and motherhood.”(Lee 179) is displayed in the films depicted in the documentary ”Slaying the Dragon” where the Asain women with her exotic sexuality falls for the white male Hero figure. In one interview in the documentary a white man stated as a child, after watching the film “Sayonara” he wanted an Asian wife because of her ability to comply with her husbands every need. Further proving the fact that the film industry has through its history created this image of the Asian female as a docile wife who in some sick way lives to serve her husband.

What is appalling to me about all of this is the way in which the Asian female is being used in the films as an exotic sex symbol with which the new modern American white male should mate with and transform into this new American housewife. It is almost as if they are just a toy or a puppet in a bigger game in which the film industry is the tool to which this message is conveyed to the people. For me I wish love was depicted as love regardless of race. People are people, with their own thoughts feeling beliefs, and sexuality. However by depicting the Asian female in this light, which was done in great extent in the 1950′s and 60′s it is yet again creating another stereotype which creates an image of Asian American women which may be untrue and de-grading, for future generations in America.

Dave’ Reading Keanu, Beauty Queens, and Tiger Woods

While reading the chapters from “East Main Street” for Fridays seminar I was putting my best efforts forward in order to find connections between the chapters in which I chose to read. The chapters I chose looked at the Iconography of Tiger Woods, The Japanese Beauty pageants, and finally the subject of Keanu Reeves, the show Smallville, and Racial Outing. From these chapters I noticed several themes in which linked one chapter to another.

One of the connections I noticed was the use of both Tiger Woods, and the Japanese Beauty Queens as a link between those who are of color and “White America.” Furthermore I couldn’t help but notice the way both were used as a form of bringing in revenue for business. The Japanese beauty Queens were used to show that the Japanese had assimilated into American culture and were “All American girls,” while Tiger Woods was depicted as “America’s son.” However I noticed that their were alternate motives towards creating this image. In the beauty pageant’s case Japanese businesses were attempting to create business by proving their daughters and their race have assimilated into American society and from this image would create more business from White Americans. Nike too, used Tiger Woods, as a poster child to show off his success in golf which has predominantly been a sport for the upper class members of white society. I found it interesting how business and money have aided in creating an image for both Tiger Woods and the Japanese community. I also wish to know if any of my fellow classmates noticed this connection and would like to hear their thoughts on the matter?

There was another connection that I noticed but am not sure if it is even plausible. However for the sake of getting my readers brains churning I feel it is important to mention this observation I have made between the chapter pertaining to Tiger Woods and the chapter discussing Keanu Reeves. It is this idea that we only see what is easily visible to us through appearance. Tiger Woods stated that he is “Cablinasian” which pertains to his being part Caucasian, Black, Indian, and Asian. However from “East Main Street” we see that though his mother is Thai the commercialization of Tiger Woods leans towards the relationship he has with his African American Father(234). If it wasn’t for the knowledge we have read on Tiger Woods that clarifies he is of Asian and African American descent would we see him as anything other then an African American male? Along with this Keanu Reeves is a mixed race celebrity, however his appearance is that of a white male. He is able to therefore cross between being a person with a mixed racial background, and of the prototypical white leading man in Hollywood. What I am getting at from all this rambling is that color or appearance always seems to play a role in some way. No matter how much we accept other peoples race and culture in our society, race itself will never stop being an issue in our society until these physical appearances become unnoticed. Until when we as a nation look at Tiger Woods or Keanu Reeves and only see a person, and not the color of their skin. When only the character of a person is noticed and marketed to the public and not their racial affiliation.

Breaking Stereotypes

Waverly takes her mother, Lindo, back to her fancy apartment and shows off the expensive fur coat that her fiance, Rich, bought for her. Lindo is unimpressed and remains stoic even as her daughter throws underwear and condoms at her in an attempt to force her to acknowledge the relationship.

In Orientals Lee brings up the example of The Cheat. In this movie wardrobe are used to set apart Tori and Edith, who dress in a flashy metaphor to consumerism, and Edith’s husband Richard who dresses in the dark clothes of a ‘rational’ businessman. “The West has historically viewed the Orient with desire as the source of luxury…”.

Waverly attempts to get her mother’s approval by showing off the luxury that she can afford because of Rich. Lindo, on the other hand, is unimpressed. Later, at the hair salon where Waverly is trying to make her mother presentable for the wedding, the two of them finally have a conversation in which Waverly admits that she wanted her mother’s approval and that she loves Rich. Lindo, who was unimpressed with his wealth, is moved instead by her daughter’s admission, telling her that she likes Rich.

In this movie there is a moment of consumerism where Waverly tries to impress her mother with the gifts she’d received from her boyfriend. Lindo, however, can’t be bothered with these things, even as they’re being literally thrown in her face.

In Slaying The Dragon there’s a moment where they ask people on the street why Asian women are attractive to them. One of the reasons, based on a Hollywood movie, was that Asian women lived to serve their men and treated them well. In the Joy Luck Club this was represented with Rose. When she married her husband she did everything that she could in order to keep him happy, including getting pregnant and having a child in an attempt to hold their marriage together. At one point in the movie she talks to her husband, Ted, and asks him what he wants for dinner. He pointedly says that he wants to hear her opinion, and instead she says “I want what will make you happy.” It’s at this point in the movie that it becomes obvious that he has lost interest in the subservient woman who takes care of him all the time, and he ends up having an affair. When Rose realizes that she is following in her grandmother’s footsteps, who didn’t see her own worth until it was too late, she takes charge, telling her husband to leave her house and to leave her daughter with her. By breaking the stereotype of being a subservient Asian wife, she and her husband remain together.