Quantitative Data Analysis
The purpose of conducting a statistical test is to determine statistical significance:
The conclusion that the results are unlikely to have occurred by chance. An
observed relationship or difference probably exists in the population.
- Probability of .05 (p = .05) or less
- Referred to as the ".05 level of significance"
- Outcome will occur by chance less than 5 times in 100
- More stringent level of significance (p = .01)
-Outcome will occur by chance less than 1 time in 100
Statistical tests are generally used to:
1. Determine the strength of a relationship
2. Determine whether there is a difference between groups
Common Statistical Tests for Calculating Difference
t test for independent means:
Used to compare the means of two samples to see whether there is a statistical
difference between the groups.
- Produces a value called an obtained t
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA):
Used to compare the means of two or more groups to see whether statistical
differences exist between the groups. To know where the significant difference
are, a post hoc analysis is necessary.
- F value
Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA):
Used for equating groups on one or more variables. It adjusts scores on a dependent
variable for initial differences on other variables, such as a pretest score.
- F value
Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA):
An extension of ANOVA which incorporates two or more dependent variables in
the same analysis. Used only when researcher has reason to believe relationships
exist between the dependent variables.
- Value is called Wilk's lambda
Chi-Square Test:
Used to analyze data that are reported in categories such as gender.
- (X2)
Common Statistical Tests for Calculating Relationship
Pearson Product Moment Correlation:
Used to compare groups when data in interval (percentage) or ratio (frequency)
scales. Determines degree of relationship between variables in a group. Produces
a correlation coefficient to describe the strength of relationship.
- r
Magnitude of r
|
Interpretation
|
0.00-0.40 |
Of little practical importance. Possible to use for theoretical
purposes. |
.0.41-0.60 |
Large enough to be of practical and theoretical use. |
0.61-0.80 |
Strong relationship, may have predictive value. |
0.81 or above |
Very sizable relationship. Highest predictive use. |
Effect Size (ES):
Used to assess the magnitude of a difference between groups. Used when researchers
look at the outcomes of many studies that measure the same variable (meta-analysis).
May also be used with in a study.
- ES of .50 or higher is considered to be an important finding
- (_)
Common Statistical Tests for Calculating
Prediction
Multiple Regression:
Analysis used to determine a correlation (relationship) between a criterion
variable and the best combination of two or more predictor variables.
- r
- Verbal score on SAT and high school GPA (predictor variables) have a high
positive correlation (r = +.68) for first-semester college GPA (criterion variable).
- Strength of correlation is symbolized by R
- R of .70 - .80 are considered quite high
- _ R = more reliable prediction
Path Analysis:
Used to test the possibility of a causal connection among three or more variables.
Identifying causal variables could explain why a phenomenon occurs.
- r
- Example hypothesis: Students who feel alienated at school …
relevance of coursework _ school enjoyment _ number of friends
Research Definitions
Abstract:
Summary of the study that describes the most important aspects, including major
findings and conclusions.
Variable:
A characteristic that can assume any one of several values, such as ethnicity,
height, or teaching method.
Dependent Variable:
A variable expected to be affected by the independent variable. Sometimes called
the criterion or outcome variable. Effect of method of instruction on history
test score; the dependent variable is the test score (represented on y axis).
Independent Variable:
A variable that is presumed to affect the dependent variable. Sometimes called
the experimental or treatment variable (represented on the x axis), such as
method of instruction.
Triangulation:
Cross checking of data using multiple data sources or multiple data collection
procedures. For example, using both quantitative and qualitative methods to
collect information on the effects of teaching methods on final exam scores,
student motivation in the class, and teacher enthusiasm.
Reference
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research
in education (2nd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
|