compton response

Submitted by Adam on Sat, 01/26/2008 - 11:17pm.
<!--StartFragment-->

 

 

Introduction to Positive Psychology by William Compton, was a comprehensive, user friendly textbook that maps in out in detail the major landmarks of Positive Psychology, which center around the three elements of: Positive connections to others, positive individual traits and life regulation qualities (7).  In writing this book it was very apparent that Compton was not trying to present himself as a personal authority who knew the answers.  In the beginning of the book he qualifies the research presented by saying,

“Science cannot address in any ultimate or absolute sense what values a person must believe or practice in her or his life… What psychology can do is investigate the consequences of holding certain values…In addition, scientific methods can be applied to any cultural setting or in any society around the world to discover what values tend to enhance the quality of life.” (9)  So in this sense it was very much a do-it-yourself book, that holds the reader responsible for deciding what was important and meaningful.

One of the things that I appreciated most about Compton’s synthesis was the in depth, historical picture of how positive psychology emerged as a social science. 

In Chapter one, he premises the current field by distilling a wide variety of theories across the centuries all pretaining to the search for happiness.   For me, it was particularly interesting to see that the ancient Greek philosophers- Socrates and Plato stressed the search for wisdom and self-knowledge beyond the realm of sensory perception.  This seems to have corrallary echoes with Positive psychology’s slant 2000+ years later advocating against archetypal hedonism and for the cultivation of altruistic character traits as the basis of ones wellbeing.  Then, in the Middle ages with the authoritarian influences of the church,  much of the Western (Eurocentric) cosmology of happiness regressed into the belief that, “…true happiness as opposed to secular temporary pleasures, was delayed until after death and the resurrection into heaven” (17).

Skipping ahead to the 20th Century, it was also interesting to read and reflect on the notion that “positive psychology” was in many ways a monumental paradigm shift.  Up until recently, “psychologists used to assume that, if a person could eliminate their negative emotions, then positive emotions would naturally take their place”(10). Compton went on to say that “simply decreasing a person’s degree of pessimism may have no major increase in whether a person feels happy or not. To increase positive mood a person has to increase optimism as well as decrease pessimism” (10).   These passages impressed on me the notion that this active cultivation of positive affect was a revolutionary endeavor in the psychological mainstream. 

In many ways, Introduction to Positive Psychology seemed to be the ideological mirror of Martin Seligman’s Authentic Happiness—stressing the familiar subjects of: Optimism, Altruistic values (generosity, caring compassion), Flow/Mindfulness and the  positive emotional reinforcement in the context of relationships. Compton also includes a few new chapters dedicated “self-actualization” creativity and wisdom.  In these chapters he borrows heavily from Humanist psychological perspectives and the work of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers.  Here it was interesting to note that although currently accepted psychotherapy practices scorn the Humanist perspective, Positive Psychology—as represented in this book—is readily accepting of notions of transcendence that were formulated during the 1970’s.  In reading this book I often found myself getting lost amidst the oceanic composite of scientific studies and topic ranges.  The result of which is that I sometimes got frustrated to in trying to read this text as a self-help book.  It did not have the personal touch and personality that was evident in Seligman’s book.  That being said, while I didn’t come away from this text with any shocking new insights, reading Introduction to Positive Psychology helped me to strengthen and reinforced my conceptual understanding of life transforming strategies for well-being.

 

<!--EndFragment-->
Sue-Marie's picture
Submitted by Sue-Marie on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 10:13am.

I also noticed that much of positive psychology seems to borrow from the humanistic perspective and found it interesting that the term “transpersonal psychology” does not appear in Compton’s book.  Do you think this indicates a lack of intellectual honesty on the part of Compton?  Do you think he was trying to avoid these words because they have been, as you point out, largely scorned by the psychological community?

 

I also enjoyed the brief synopsis of Buddhism in Compton’s book.  I thought he gave an interesting description of the four noble truths, without using the term “four noble truths.”  I am beginning to think positive psychology is a blend of Buddhist and transpersonal psychology.  I think the term “positive psychology” is more accessible to Westerners than either Buddhist psychology of transpersonal psychology.  Yet I find myself wondering, how much of this is actually new?


Sandy's picture
Submitted by Sandy on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 1:31pm.

Adam,
Upon reading your synopsis, one concept struck me.  It is profound in its simplicity. "simply decreasing a person’s degree of pessimism may have no major increase in whether a person feels happy or not. To increase positive mood a person has to increase optimism as well as decrease pessimism." If you tell a person what not to do, that does not mean the person knows what to do in its place.  When a person is trying to rid himself or herself of an addictive behavior, it can help the situation by replacing the negative behavior one wants to be rid of, and replace it with a positive behavior.  It takes some thought to figure out what will be satisfying enough to "fill the void" and help so the person does not regress back to the former negative coping skill. Positive psychology is necessary so a therapist doesn't leave a client hanging.
Good points you made.


Taurell Reboulet's picture
Submitted by Taurell Reboulet on Tue, 01/29/2008 - 8:28pm.
Adam  I like the insights you made in the historical aspect of Positive Psychology, It was well thought out and used good quotes to strengthen your ideas. I also found my self having a hard time really enjoying the book because of all the studies and topics, but as fair as a text book goes I learned a lot from such a small text book. 

Karen Jones's picture
Submitted by Karen Jones on Tue, 01/29/2008 - 7:26pm.
It sounds like you got a lot out of this reading. I too felt a little overwhelmed in the scientific studies and topic base. I mainly just scanned over that data and refered to it later, that seemed to help me not get lost in all the studies.