Compton's Introduction To Positive Psychology

Beth's picture
Submitted by Beth on Mon, 01/28/2008 - 1:09pm.

Positive Psychology

Instructor:  Dr Mark Hurst, Winter 2007/08

Student:  Elizabeth Lahren, A00092341

 An Introduction To Positive Psychology By William C. Compton

William Compton’s book covers the basics of positive psychology in four different areas.  These areas were the foundations of positive psychology, positive emotional states, positive traits, and the positive institutions and looking toward the future in the study of positive psychology.  Mr. Compton began his discussion by giving us the definition of “the good life”.  He wrote that it refers to the factors that contribute most to a well-lived and fulfilling life.  He quoted Martin Seligman on page 7 as the good life as “using your signature strengths every day to produce authentic happiness and abundant gratification”.  The good life has been seen as a combination of our positive connections to others, positive individual traits, and life regulation qualities.

Mr. Compton refers to Mihayi Csikszentmihalyi many times in the publication.  He quotes Dr. Csikszentmihalyi (1990) on page 11, “enjoyment involves meeting expectations or fulfilling a need and then going beyond those expectations to create something new, unexpected, or even unimagined …one of the tasks of positive psychology is to investigate how people create both pleasurable experiences and a deeper sense of enjoyment in life.”    I thought that this idea is the basis of positive psychology.

In section two of the publication, I found jewels of the secrets of positive psychology.  For example, on page 52 he writes, “intimate social relationships appear to provide even greater enhancements of subjective well-being.  One study found that intimacy, defined as relationships with spouse and family and high-quality friendships, was the strongest predictor of life satisfaction (Cummings 1996), more so than other predictors such as material well-being, health, and leisure satisfaction.”  What a gem.

Section three covers positive traits.  What was most interesting is why religiosity is related to well-being?  This is because it provides social support, supports healthy lifestyles, promotes personality integration, and may increase generativity.  Religiosity also provides unique coping strategies and provides a sense of meaning and purpose. (pg 198)  I was very pleased to see Viktor Frankl used as a resource in the book.  Compton uses Viktor’s existentialist therapy as quoted, “our approach to suffering was one of the primary determinants of how we experience meaning in life.  Through suffering and difficulties people are forced to reevaluate their lives.  Through this reevaluation, there is a possibility for transformation”.  Pg 203)

In section 4 Compton discusses the newer career paths of positive psychology as being life coaching.  As he points out, many people are well adjusted and functioning satisfactorily but may find themselves stuck at some point.  They need only a few suggestions, a new perspective, or a little encouragement to get moving again.  It is hoped that positive psychologists will become interested in life coaching in the future and will find a way to regulate or standardize the training and certification for such.

My personal conclusion of this publication is that it was a very hard read.  There were too many repetitions, overly wordy, too long, and very dry.  Reader’s Digest condensed version would be a great thing.  It would be difficult to recommend this book to anyone.


Jeremy H.'s picture
Submitted by Jeremy H. on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 4:01pm.

“intimate social relationships appear to provide even greater enhancements of subjective well-being".

Nice. so this means i CAN hang out with friends my friends all the time and stay up late watching movies with my girlfriend. I knew my parents didn't know what they were talking about.

Nice summary of the matierial Beth. I couldn't agree more with the main points you brought up. I particualarly like the "jewels" that you discovered.


Sue-Marie's picture
Submitted by Sue-Marie on Fri, 02/01/2008 - 10:27am.

You started this book before me and warned it was a dry read.  This was not my experience of the book.  I found it to be a rich examination of how philosophers and psychologists have approached this topic going back to the ancient Greeks.  Rather than see this as repetitive, I found myself noticing patterns.  One thing that helps me determine whether concepts are purely theoretical or actually descriptive of human nature is to consider if the concepts have withstood the test of time.  I consider the pursuit of happiness to be germane to humanity because people have concerned themselves with it throughout recorded history. 

To me, the fact so many points were examined through different perspectives merely offered support that these are valid points.  This is what makes Compton’s book different from, say, a book by Wayne Dyer.  I appreciated that Compton’s ego stayed out of the book, and found it to be quite well written and well presented.  I don’t know that I would recommend it to a lay person.  But for anyone studying psychology or working in the helping professions, I would recommend it without hesitation.

 


Submitted by John L on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 10:24am.

Hi Beth, thank you for condensing this hard to read book for me, are you undercover for Readers Digest? You expressed well, the poignant points (is that repetitive, repetitive?) As so eloquently expressed it is through suffering that reevaluation can occur to gain skills to navigate the stuck points of life. If a person reaches out to others in an attempt to gain perspective and support this can increase intimate bonds. Who wooda thunk it, positive from negative.

John

Lisa's picture
Submitted by Lisa on Tue, 01/29/2008 - 6:51pm.
Beth - Good job on pointing out the main ideas of the book.  I would agree with you that two of the "jewels" of the book were the section of subjective well-being with reference to Cummings quote and also the the portion on suffering.  I also appreciate your candidness of your thoughts on this book.  It always interests me how one person can find a booking appealing/interesting and another doesn't.  I did enjoy the book but I can also understand it when you said it was very dry.  However, looking on the positive side you did find two gems in it!