Category Archives: paper

Reading questions dave

What do you think was so appealing about Sessue Hayakawa to audiences and what in his personality was different from the rest of the actors

What impact do you think Asian-Americans of the Nisei generation have had on America regarding stereotypes for asian or do you think they’ve had any impact at all

“Over 12 million asian and asian americans live in the US”, thats crazy compared to the numbers we heard last quarter in the projects and other readings.

“Within beauty pageants, beauty queens are embodied symbols of which racial, gendered, and national meanings are inscribed”

Using beauty pageants as a way to connect with the larger white community as it was something that both both cultures share in common somehow, and also allowed that to gain more business. “Women in the pageant were working with white standards of beauty pageants in mind and re-creating them with a Japanese American twist.”206 Using this as their form of connecting with the white community and to ‘fit in’

“In this era, Japanese American pageants responded to widening awareness of feminist values in liberal cities like san francisco by omitting bathing suit or fitness competitions and not stating the body measurements of candidates in the program” pg 209

“They referred to feminism as the “f” word and wanted to act like feminist but not be feminists because ugly feminists were white.

I like that this was a way for Japanese American women to honor alternate models of beauty which it discusses on 213. Even though these woman weren’t being given a chance to be recognized as miss America, they were still being recognized and were able to celebrate being asian- american

I FORGOT TO PUT PAGES NUMBERS. at some point ill go back and add them.

-Dave Chap 10 Talking Point

In chapter 10, she talked about Japanese American pageants. Reading this chapter complicated me more about the meaning of Japanese Americans, because I was curios how they judge the candidates for who would win Nisei Week. What was the criterion for judgment? Were they only the looks? Or, should the candidates do some demonstrations relating with Japanese culture? I found that I need to know how to choose the queens, because depending on the way to judge, these pageants like The Nisei Week Queen Pageant would be truly good events for inheriting Japanese culture or not. So, I decided to choose this as a talking point.

East Main Street, Talking Points

Chapter 10

“why could the pageants  never completely assimilate  with American style?”

 

Chapter 14

“do you think that the sexual identity is more invisible than racial identity?”

“why gay sexuality seems to erase racial marking?”

East Main Street Talking Points

Regarding Japanese American beauty pageants, what are some connections to Slaying The Dragon: Asian Women in U.S. Television and Film?

The Japanese American pageants initially accepted only 100% Japanese, but as time went on they started to include half-Japanese participants. Do you think this makes these pageants just as American as the others in the nation or still exclusively Japanese American?

Aside from Tiger Woods, what other multi-ethnic “icons” come into mind? Does the 2009 scandal affect not only his image, but the ethnicities he is affiliated with?

If Tiger Woods was a professional in another sport other than golf, would he have still attained the same level “icon” level?

What are some similarities or differences between hapa actors like Keanu Reeves and full-Asian actors like Chow Yun Fat? Any connections to the film The Slanted Screen: Asian Men in Film and Television?

“Like race, kryptonite seems to be everywhere in Smallville although no one seems to understand it, and everyone denies having any,” (285). What are the implications of this  quote?

Friday Seminar

“These persons and practices only became visible after a change in consciousness” (pg. 122)

You know how you can not notice something forever, until that one time you notice it or hear about it, and then you start seeing it everywhere?  This is what that quote reminded me of.  In this case Bascara was referring to the queer world that went completely unnoticed, until people were ready to notice it.  I feel like this is true for many different areas of life.  It also makes me think of what we talked about in seminar on Thursday; about a slanted truth.  People sometimes need the truth to be given to them piece by piece rather than all at once.

Also, kind of off topic, but I read an article that said that Disney Channel introduced their first same-sex couple on the TV show Good Luck Charlie.  I thought this was interesting and sort of tied into this quote because, why now?  I guess people are used to it, or are ready for it now.  I’m curious though how this can be applied to Asian American stereotypes and breaking away from those stereotypes.  Has anything changed since “The Slanted Screen” was made?

East Main Street Chapters 4, 11 & 14

Chapter 4 

“Lakshmi’s image on the show is deliberately sexualized. Typically, she wears revealing outfits — leather pants, short T-shirts exposing her midriff, tight sleeveless dresses, low-cut blouses — not typically associated with the “sensible clothing” style of most Food Network stars.”

“Been read as signs that Asian Americans have “made” it.” (89)

The  quote is talking about Padma Lakshmi, how she is seen as a sex icon for the Food Network. Has she really made it on the Food network for being great at what she does or filling the stereotypes for being the exotic type and sex symbol?

I think that it is sad that Padma Lakshmi has to be seen as  this exotic sex symbol type. I am sure that she is great at what she does, but i that we should fight to show people that we aren’t what the stereotypes say we are. You don’t see Martha Stewart wearing low cut shirts, but maybe her image for Food Network is the typical housewife (but then again I think that crashed and burned when she went to jail). I think Padma Lakshmi did make it on the Food Network for being good at what she does but I don’t think the sex symbol and exotic look is what they wanted more.

Chapter 14 

“Seeing race is a matter of understanding which visual cues matter and which ones we can ignore.” pg. 277

Many people say it is neccessary to see color. Do you think its necessary to see race/color? Will someones physical race effect how they are approach by others?

I think we do need to see race. We need to understand and learn about each race. I think that we can’t let race affect us from learning about each other. Its true that we need to see “which visual cues matter and which ones we can ignore” we can’t let one loud comment out of an African American man lead us to thinking he is a thug. So many times people let physical race get in our way of knowing who others are. People are turned away when they see a Middle Eastern person because they think it might be a terrorist. Or back in 1941 when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor every Japanese American was looked upon as a suspect. I think that race gets in our way to many times, and why?  Whats the point?

EMS Talking Points

After reading about Keanu Reeves, does your interpretation or understanding of his role in 47 Ronin change at all?

What are some other connections that can be made to Tiger Woods? Perhaps another athlete or a movie star; any celebrity who’s image, whether dictated by corporate or personal means, promotes a “color-blind” society while capitalizing on their race as a driving factor or selling point?

What are the implications of the differences between racial and sexual outing? Can you make any connections between other shows, movies, stories, etc. to Smallville (in the light that racial and sexual outing are examined as intertwined or intersecting)?

The story of the manong raises many questions and observations. One of them I found to be especially important was near the conclusion of the article by Bascara. “The assignation of gay identity is clearly inappropriate. Even queerness seems an odd fit because so many never really surrendered their dreams of conventional domesticity and cling to nostalgic memories of having been ‘ladies’ men’”. Can you make any connection between this and The Slanted Screen? Perhaps, a link to the desexualization of Asian American males in popular culture?

Class Notes 1/31

bound·a·ry

[boun-duh-ree, -dree] noun, plural bound·a·ries. 1. something that indicates boundaries or limits; a limiting or bounding line.

In class today we related Slanted Screen, Orientals, and Saving Face together by relating them to the term “boundary.” Above I gave Dictionary.com‘s definition of boundary  and in class, we defined boundaries as a division, borders, or lines. All three relate to boundaries of sexuality, opportunity, traditions, interracial boundaries and more.

We eventually moved onto East Main Street and the different chapters. Each chapter has a different topic, but they all have the same theme of having these boundaries given to them.

The first chapter we covered was chapter 6, “Within Each Crack/A Story.” This chapter covers the “political economy of queering Filipino American pasts” (117). The title can mean various things, like the cracks in our hans, or cracks in a story, or even a butt crack.

queer

[kweer] 

adjective, queer·er, queer·est.

1. strange or odd from a conventional viewpoint; unusually different; singular: a queer notion of justice.

2.of a questionable nature or character; suspicious; shady: Something queer about the language  of theprospectus kept investors away.
3.not feeling physically right or well; giddy, faint, or qualmish: to feel queer.
4.mentally unbalanced or deranged.
5. Slang: Disparaging and Offensive.

a. homosexual
 b. effeminate; unmanly.

Queer has many different meanins; however, in today’s society, most people only understand “queer” as the derogatory term. In this chapter, though, queer is actually used in both the strange or odd conventional viewpoint and the homosexual meaning. On page 125 it states, “‘They like you because you eat dog,’” obviously this is a queer view of it being something that would seem mentally unbalanced in the American culture;  furthermore, this essay tries to use “‘queer domesticity’ to characterize pre- 1965 communitities of Filipino laborers”(119). In a sense, some habits of Filipino culture can be seen queer to the American eyes, yet what Filipino had to go through is quite queer itself insofaras to America sees the Philippines as “little brown children” (124). As the Filipino community tries to assimilate to America, America has set this boundary in which they cannot cross.

The second chapter we covered was chapter 10 “Miss Cherry Blossom Meets Mainstream America.” This chapter covered Japanes American second generation (Nisei) beauty pageants and how they tried to assimilate to American cultures. There was a boundary already set up against the Japanese-Amreican culture to prevent them from being part of the American culture so creating pageants that “mimiced” mainstream America (208). Their way of mimicing the American culture was their way to prove to the whites that they were trying to assimilate, “by dressing the queen in western garb and promoting her keen and usually native-born ability to speak English, the community highlighted the “Americanness” of Japanese Americans…They too could claim to be ‘All American Girls’ by mimicking and adopting hegemonic American cultural values such as innocence, sexual purtity, honesty, and caring” (207). Instead of being able to cross this boundary of beauty pageants, Nisei pageants ended up making a new boundary to acceptance of a new kind of beauty pageant of Japanese American culture.

The last chapter we covered for the day was chapter 14, “How to Rehabilitate a Mulatto.”

mu·lat·to

[muh-lat-oh, -lah-toh, myoo-] 

noun, plural mu·lat·toes, mu·lat·tos.

1. Anthropology . (not in technical use) the offspring of one white parent and one black parent.
2. Older Use: Often Offensive. a person who has both black and white ancestors.
adjective
3. of a light-brown color.
As most people know, Tiger Woods is a “mulatto” and a famous golfer. Golfing is seen as a rich, “white” sport, Woods has already crossed that boundary by just being part Black. He does not call himself that; instead, he calls himself  a “‘Cablinasian,’ Black, Indian, and Asian” (222). He does not refer to himself as just one race, though most people see him just as a Black golfer. He crosses the boundary of identifying himself as an “African American” or “Asian American” he instead, refers to a combination of his ethnicities. There was also an exerpt in the book about Nike and the commericals they aired. Tiger had an ad where a group of children of all different races stated, “I am Tiger Woods.” Instead of having one person wishing to be that idol of a certain race or ethnicity, Wood’s commercial has portrayed a variety of cultures. This erases the lines created by racism and instead of categorizing the races, the races are all together as one.

Week 4, Thursday. Talking points (fri seminar)

Chapter 6.

Other than discouraging male Asian American immigrants to stay in America by not allowing female immigrants to easily join them/their communities, in what other ways did this set Asian American men and their self-created communities up for queer discrimination?
Influenced by quote on page 124: “Until the post-1965 era, Filipino American communities were not exactly conventional domestic units” (Bascara).

Chapter 10.

“With the increase in multiracial participants, people’s attention was drawn to the issue of who, racially, could claim to speak for or represent the [Japanese American] community as a whole,” (page 215, King-O’Riain).
In this context, the focus is on beauty pageants, but on a broader scale: is there ever one perfect-fitting representative for any oppressed minority/community? And who gets to choose these representatives vs. who gets to choose if these representatives are accepted (both within and outside of the community)?

Chapter 14.

How do we, as a class looking at Asian Americans represented by others and representing themselves in pop culture, begin to look at those in the media who are passing white but multiracial (such as Keanu Reeves). How do we begin to interrogate our ideas of “what an Asian looks like” vs. begin to look at possible privileges of those who are passing white, multiracial people?
Influenced by quotes on page 284: “Is [Reeves] Asian because he ‘looks Asian’? Or Asian because he self-identifies as Asian? Or simply Asian because he has Asian blood” (Nishime) and, “Yet the two issues cannot be separated since Reeve’s stardom may depend on his ability to pass as white in the majority of American theatres” (Nishime).

 

 

Talking Points – East Main Street 1/30/2014

- The Evolution of Beauty Pageants: What were the stark differences between the early (1930s-1950s) period of Japanese American pageantry and the modern era?

- In the early years, why did Japanese Americans find it so important to bring a bi-cultural element to the pageants, despite the racist attitudes against them?

- There was a definite evolution of identity throughout the three eras described in the chapter The early period is very much the need for Identity – to blend in, to be absorbed, whereas the later period is dominated by the need to preserve identity and culture. I think the evolution of identity is something that appears in pretty much all our work, as well as the ideological battle of conformity vs being unique. Are there any parallels one could draw between the changing identity of the beauty pageants and other works we have examined?

- Smallville and/or Superman as a metaphor for race relations and immigration. Agree or disagree?

- Also if anyone has seen the show, does viewing Clark and Lex’s relationship through a homosexual lens change how you yourself view the characters? Can you apply this to any other character relationships seen throughout entertainment history? One that I come back to a lot is the relationship between Sherlock Holmes and Watson, something which actually they poke fun at a lot in the BBC Sherlock series.