Click here to view the embedded video.
Today we talked about CRISIS and what role it plays in Asian American culture. Overall, I feel like there is a crisis within the Asian realm of media. For instance, in today’s movie earlier, we watched The Slanted Screen: Asian Men in Film and Television. In the documentary, there was a typical stereo-type of Asian men being either being a bad guy or some sort of “kung-fu” master. There was a famous actor, Sessue Hayakawa, who was the first Asian-American actor to incorporate himself in interracial relationships. Though it was a ground-breaking move for Asians in media, it still has not helped too much in today’s society. Keep in mind that these films were made many decades ago; however, movies today in 2014, are still very similar. Yes, there are Asian protagonists, yet there are still typical Asian stereo-types portrayed. In Romeo Must Die, Jet Li is Asian and he is very good at martial arts and the main female role, Aaliyah (African-American) does not end up with Romeo who essentially saves her. The title says ROMEO, so it implies a Romeo and Juliet sort of a tone, but they do not fall in love. Though that it just an implication, there are still stereo-types of Asian American men with knowing karate and being the bad guy in today’s society, creating a crisis of Asian American identity within media.
In addition to the stereo-types, there are also different standards that Asian-American men are held up to in America. There was a snippet of one of the Actors from The Slanted Screen about Bruce Lee and how in America, he had to keep his mask and clothes on to do his physical scenes; however, in China, he can reveal himself and take his shirt off to do his fighting scenes. I thought that this was a crisis in a way that, Lee’s films ended up being famous here in America anyways. Also, it sets up this standard that Asian’s cannot reveal their true-selves in a way. So again, a crisis with who Asian American’s are.
We also watched a movie, Saving Face, which is about a lesbian Asian woman who takes in her mother who is pregnant and will not tell who the father is. Their two roles already are seen as “disgraced” in a typical Asian culture. In this movie, this also creates a crisis again with identity. The characters do not stand as stereo-typed Asian women in a crisis with playing cheesy stereo-types, but a crisis in which they do not fit within typical Asian cultures.
Thinking about the title of the movie I see it relating to keeping the “face” or reputation of both Ma’s and Wil’s family. First off, Ma marries someone who she does not truly love and ends up having Wil. She marries this man to make her father happy and to keep the family’s successful reputation up. So he ends up dying and she somehow gets pregnant! Who is the daddy? Throughout the movie she does not say a thing. Ma ends up getting herself in this arranged marriage to, again, make her father proud of her and to keep his reputation up. However, Wil finds out that her mothers first marriage was not out of love, but business. At the end, we find out it was Little Yu that she had an affair with. And the mother accepts that she must follow her heart instead of instructions and orders.
Wil is a lesbian. Her mother, in the past, found her with a girl but did not say anything about it. Her mother ended up pushing Wil to find a man and get married. Her mother tried to cover up the possibility that Wil could be gay. This causes Wil to be very timid around her mother about her social life. For instance, when her neighbor, Jay (who is black), comes over her mother makes really racist remarks against him in Chinese, very subtly though. This causes Wil to be aggravated. Then when Vivian pushes Wil to let her meet Ma, Ma accuses Vivian of not liking black people because she did not want to date Jay. When Ma acts up about Vivian dating Jay, it was as if Ma knew they were dating, but did not want to admit it to herself. Wil eventually comes out to her mother and tells her that that was who she was.
In this film, there was also some graphic nudity and identity crisis. I feel like this movie breaks a lot of ground as to having both leading roles to be disgraces to typical Asian cultures. This again, is like an identity crisis within their own culture. Both Ma and Wil cannot truly be themselves because it is not what their family wants to see. As for the graphic nudity, I find it amusing how before, Bruce Lee could not show himself without his shirt on here in the U.S., but now there are movies with lesbian sex scenes. Thus, there is media progress, but still identity crisis.
Overall, the films we had talked about today related to this crisis of stereo-typing and breaking ground in media. In Slanted Screen there was discussion on both stereo-typing and making media history for Asian-American’s with interracial relationships and breaking the “bad guy” view of Asians. In Saving Face there is lesbian acceptance from her family and Ma’s father accepting her decision to be with who she truly loves. There is a lot of different scopes to see crisis; for instance, identity crisis within the media sphere and the identity crisis within one’s own culture. In the end I feel they all relate to identity and being able to make it within each individual environment.
Relating this all to Lee’s Orientals I would have to bring it back to stereo-types. So in Slanted Screen the Asian actors could not be “sexual” they can be romantic, but that’s it. So in Slanted Screen we saw Asian men as romantics, flirts, or sexual-less. Opposed to Saving Face Ma is a woman who has sex with someone, ends up getting pregnant, and does not share who the father is; thus, giving the stereo-type of Asian women has sly, secretive, and hyper-sexual. Wil, too, gets intimate with Vivian a few times, but acts very timid in public; therefore, leaving the audience to see both Vivian and Wil as these secret sexual beings.Then none of the men in the movie are scene as coming off as promiscuous in any way. This relates to the crisis of Lee introducing the sexual views that American’s have put on Asians. It still lives on in today’s media. So, how do we, as a society fix the media? I suppose that question is a crisis within itself.