6. “Within Each Crack/ A Story”, Victor Bascara.
This article on the “queering” of Filipino American history opens up new world to both the queer definition and the domestic unit of the original Filipino labor men. The usage of queer in this article creates an even broader umbrella for the term which serves up both pros and cons. Of course, the pros of “queering” history come from the vices that arise out of what was a very silenced time for queer individuals. Those who broke the nuclear family model and went against the heteronormative expectation were majorly underrepresented, so for those who still find themselves outside of the nuclear, heteronormative mold it is important to see those stories grow from the silence. However, the cons of opening up the word queer could come into play if those using the word were doing so in an inappropriate reclaiming, as the queer community is still oppressed and victimized for being queer.
However, with that caution in mind, the article still demonstrated the way in which the Filipino men created their own communities, mostly composed of other men in a unit. Of course, despite Filipinas being unable to immigrate initially, there were still men who married and had relations with women. However, these marriages were still seen as being beyond the proper nuclear family and determined unassimilatable. Perhaps, this was a strategy created by those who dictated the proper family structure and who wanted to keep immigrant of color out; to not allow their wives or female family to immigrate as well they were setting those first Filipinos up to create their own queer communities. “A horizontal brotherhood rather than a parent-child model was the idealized social ordering” (page 124).
10. “Miss Cherry Blossom Meets Mainstream America”, Rebecca Chiyoko King-O’Riain.
This article was extremely important in the way that it showed both the major influence of western beauty standards on Nisei girls as well as their resistance in losing their own culture. They found ways to represent themselves in a way that felt comfortable and appropriate to them while participating in an event that was most definitely meant to exclude them. Of course, there were drawbacks to the pageants, because there was still a heavy focus on assimilation (such as having a part of the pageant be peaking with unaccented English, page 209). And when feminism began to move its way into communities and media there was still exclusivity as to who had the voice in the feminist movement.Instead, the Asian American women pushed back against the white feminist ideas that did not apply to them, such as being more outspoken. Once again they were resisting the loss of their culture while finding platforms to feel beautiful.
This article reminded me immediately of Miss America 2014. I have never participated in a pageant nor have I followed them closely, but this last year’s winner made quite a stir. Her name is Nina Davuluri and she is the second Asian American Miss America and the first Indian American. While she participated in ball gown dress and bikini walk, her talent was a Bollywood dance.
Click here to view the embedded video.
I associated Nina Davuluri to this article not only because she is Asian American, but also because she has taken a part of her culture which is often under-represented and mocked or appropriated and showcased it as a part of who she is. Of course, there was major backlash and after her winning many people took to the internet to share their racist opinions on why she shouldn’t have won. But for both Davuluri and the Japanese American women, the pageants have given them the opportunities to speak out publicly and represent themselves in a way they choose. They are given the stage, and even if they do not win, it can be an empowering act.
14. “Guilty Pleasures: Keanu Reeves, Superman, and Racial Outing”, LeiLani Nishime.
To begin, I’ll say I was pleased and surprised to read this article because for a few of my elementary and early middle school years I was a huge Smallville fan, so to read the “queer and raced readings” of the show was both exciting and shocking. Other than the brief reminiscing, however, I was also really interested in the take on Reeve’s perceived identity and how that asks the questions of who can count as “someone” (page 277) and the dismissal of mixed-race people who do not meet the standard “look”. (I am interested to see this juxtaposed with an analysis of those who are passing-white.) By creating a standard look, however, it forces communities to either fit the mold or “deny” their identity. But like the queer Filipino communities that pushed back against the traditional domestic household as well as the creation of Nisei beauty pageants, Asian Americans in the media who do not fit the stereotyped role are pushing back to create their own representation.
Within the community of Smallville, however, those representations come more subtly. For the actors, of course, Nishime points out that seemingly Pete [Sam Jones III] and Lana [Kristin Kreuk] are the only people of color in the entire town which also tells us that they are the only people of color on the cast. And, that Lana’s character was portrayed as white until the racial outting of her character could become progressive towards the plot (page 286). But perhaps the most beautiful and subtle ways of the “race reading” is the symbolism of kryptonite in its comfort and danger.